A comparison of numerical and semi-analytical proper orthogonal decomposition methods for a fluttering plate

被引:13
|
作者
Xie, Dan [1 ]
Xu, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Coll Astronaut, Xian 710072, Peoples R China
关键词
Proper orthogonal decomposition; Numerical; Projection; Reduced-order model; Rayleigh-Ritz method; Nonlinear panel flutter; REDUCED-ORDER MODELS; CYLINDRICAL-SHELLS; PERIODIC-SOLUTIONS; CANTILEVER PLATE; OSCILLATIONS; VIBRATIONS; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; SYSTEMS; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s11071-014-1787-1
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Both a simple POD (S-POD) method calculating derivatives of the POD modes (POMs) numerically and a semi-analytical POD (P-POD) method with a projection from the POMs to the Rayleigh-Ritz modes are used to investigate a supersonic fluttering cantilever plate. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the S-POD method avoids the complex mathematical derivations due to the mode projection in the P-POD method, and the computational cost is remarkably reduced. In particular, the S-POD method is approximately 50 times faster than the P-POD method. In addition, the simply supported plate is briefly discussed using the P-POD method, which is much more efficient compared with the Galerkin method, especially for the panel with large a/b. The present study will give the researchers crucial suggestions on how to choose the S-POD method or the P-POD method for the panel with different length-to-width ratios or support conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1971 / 1989
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of numerical and semi-analytical proper orthogonal decomposition methods for a fluttering plate
    Dan Xie
    Min Xu
    Nonlinear Dynamics, 2015, 79 : 1971 - 1989
  • [2] Semi-analytical and semi-numerical methods in celestial mechanics
    Breiter, S
    DYNAMICS AND ASTROMETRY OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL CELESTIAL BODIES, 1997, : 411 - 418
  • [3] Plate on layered foundation analyzed by a semi-analytical and semi-numerical method
    Wang, YH
    Tham, LG
    Tsui, Y
    Yue, ZQ
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2003, 30 (05) : 409 - 418
  • [4] Ultrasonic Field Modeling: A Comparison of Analytical, Semi-Analytical, and Numerical Techniques
    Kundu, Tribikram
    Placko, Dominique
    Rahani, Ehsan Kabiri
    Yanagita, Tamaki
    Dao, Cac Minh
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2010, 57 (12) : 2795 - 2807
  • [5] A comparison of numerical and semi-analytical methods for the case of heat transfer equations arising in porous medium
    K. Parand
    J. A. Rad
    M. Ahmadi
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 131
  • [6] A comparison of numerical and semi-analytical methods for the case of heat transfer equations arising in porous medium
    Parand, K.
    Rad, J. A.
    Ahmadi, M.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2016, 131 (09):
  • [7] Comparison of semi-analytical and numerical methods for the scattering of acoustic waves by rough, sloped seabed geometries
    Whitchelo, Yiyi
    Haslinger, Stewart
    Colquitt, Daniel
    Williams, Duncan
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2023, 153 (03):
  • [8] Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: A numerical comparison
    Wang, Zhu
    Akhtar, Imran
    Borggaard, Jeff
    Iliescu, Traian
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 237 : 10 - 26
  • [9] Numerical methods for solving the equivalent inclusion equation in semi-analytical models
    Yan, Zhiqiang
    Zhang, Mengqi
    Jiang, Shulan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART J-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TRIBOLOGY, 2021, 235 (11) : 2455 - 2473
  • [10] A semi-analytical method for plate and grid structures
    Kuang, J. S.
    Zhang, H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2008, 161 (03) : 121 - 128