Outcomes of Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures with Patient-Specific, Evidence-Based Treatment Algorithms

被引:10
|
作者
Spross, Christian [1 ]
Zdravkovic, Vilijam [1 ]
Manser, Melanie [1 ]
Farei-Campagna, Jan Marino [1 ]
Jacxsens, Matthijs [1 ]
Jost, Bernhard [1 ]
机构
[1] Kantonsspital St Gallen, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, St Gallen, Switzerland
来源
关键词
REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; ANGULAR-STABLE PLATE; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; DISPLACED FRACTURES; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; GREATER TUBEROSITY; LOCKED PLATE;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.20.01309
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Previous studies have identified risk factors for different types of treatment of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) and allowed the development of a patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithm with the potential of improving overall outcomes and reducing complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results and complications of treating PHF using this algorithmic approach. Methods: All patients with isolated PHF between 2014 and 2017 were included and prospectively followed. The initial treatment algorithm (Version 1 [V1]) based on patients' functional needs, bone quality, and type of fracture was refined after 2 years (Version 2 [V2]). Adherence to protocol, clinical outcomes, and complications were analyzed at a 1-year follow-up. Results: The study included 334 patients (mean age, 66 years; 68% female): 226 were treated nonoperatively; 65, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); 39, with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA); and 4, with hemiarthroplasty. At 1 year, the preinjury EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) values were regained (0.88 and 0.89, respectively) and the mean relative Constant Score (CS) and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) (and standard deviation [SD]) were 96% +/- 21% and 85% +/- 16%. Overall complications and revision rates were 19% and 13%. Treatment conforming to the algorithm outperformed non-conforming treatment with respect to relative CS (97% versus 88%, p = 0.016), complication rates (16.3% versus 30.8%, p = 0.014), and revision rates (10.6% versus 26.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Treating PHF using a patient-specific, evidence-based algorithm restored preinjury quality of life as measured with the EQ-5D and approximately 90% normal shoulders as measured with the relative CS and the SSV. Adherence to the treatment algorithm was associated with significantly better clinical outcomes and substantially reduced complication and revision rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1906 / 1916
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of management of fractures of the proximal humerus using a patient-specific, evidence-based treatment algorithm
    Spross, Christian
    Farei-Campagna, Jan M.
    Manser, Melanie
    Jacxsens, Matthijs
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Jost, Bernhard
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2021, 151 : 12S - 12S
  • [2] Patient-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes following geriatric proximal femur fractures
    Becker, Nils
    Hafner, Tobias
    Pishnamaz, Miguel
    Hildebrand, Frank
    Kobbe, Philipp
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2022, 48 (02) : 753 - 761
  • [3] Patient-specific risk factors for adverse outcomes following geriatric proximal femur fractures
    Nils Becker
    Tobias Hafner
    Miguel Pishnamaz
    Frank Hildebrand
    Philipp Kobbe
    [J]. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2022, 48 : 753 - 761
  • [4] Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature
    Nho, Shane J.
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Barker, Joseph U.
    Cornell, Charles N.
    MacGillivray, John D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A : 44 - 58
  • [5] Primary analysis and outcome of an evidence-based and patient-specific treatment algorithm for midshaft clavicle fractures (MSCF) - a Swiss multicentre study
    Spross, Christian
    Schofl, Thomas
    Moor, Beat
    Suter, Aline
    Meier, Christoph
    Schar, Michael
    Schallberger, Alex
    Zdravkovic, Vilijam
    Jost, Bernhard
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2023, 153 : 2S - 2S
  • [6] Proximal humeral fractures CURRENT CONCEPTS IN CLASSIFICATION, TREATMENT AND OUTCOMES
    Murray, I. R.
    Amin, A. K.
    White, T. O.
    Robinson, C. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (01): : 1 - 11
  • [7] Management of proximal humeral fractures: a review of current treatment options
    Kadavkolan, Aditya Sai
    Wasnik, Sandeep S.
    [J]. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2015, 26 (02): : 169 - 180
  • [8] Residents' patient-specific clinical questions: Opportunities for evidence-based learning
    Schilling, LM
    Steiner, JF
    Lundahl, K
    Anderson, RJ
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [9] Management of Radial Nerve Injury Associated with Humeral Shaft Fractures: An Evidence-Based Approach
    Elton, Suzanne G.
    Rizzo, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2008, 24 (08) : 569 - 573
  • [10] Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment Produced Similar Outcomes for Proximal Humeral Fractures
    Krieg, James C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (22): : 1890 - 1890