Ten simple rules for making a vocabulary FAIR

被引:25
|
作者
Cox, Simon J. D. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Beltran, Alejandra N. [2 ]
Magagna, Barbara [3 ]
Marinescu, Maria-Cristina [4 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Land & Water, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Sci & Technol Facil Council, Didcot, Oxon, England
[3] Environm Agcy Austria, Vienna, Austria
[4] Barcelona Supercomp Ctr BSC CNS, Barcelona, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009041
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We present ten simple rules that support converting a legacy vocabulary-a list of terms available in a print-based glossary or in a table not accessible using web standards-into a FAIR vocabulary. Various pathways may be followed to publish the FAIR vocabulary, but we emphasise particularly the goal of providing a globally unique resolvable identifier for each term or concept. A standard representation of the concept should be returned when the individual web identifier is resolved, using SKOS or OWL serialised in an RDF-based representation for machine-interchange and in a web-page for human consumption. Guidelines for vocabulary and term metadata are provided, as well as development and maintenance considerations. The rules are arranged as a stepwise recipe for creating a FAIR vocabulary based on the legacy vocabulary. By following these rules you can achieve the outcome of converting a legacy vocabulary into a standalone FAIR vocabulary, which can be used for unambiguous data annotation. In turn, this increases data interoperability and enables data integration.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ten simple rules for making training materials FAIR
    Garcia, Leyla
    Batut, Berenice
    Burke, Melissa L.
    Kuzak, Mateusz
    Psomopoulos, Fotis
    Arcila, Ricardo
    Attwood, Teresa K.
    Beard, Niall
    Carvalho-Silva, Denise
    Dimopoulos, Alexandros C.
    del Angel, Victoria Dominguez
    Dumontier, Michel
    Gurwitz, Kim T.
    Krause, Roland
    McQuilton, Peter
    Le Pera, Loredana
    Morgan, Sarah L.
    Rauste, Paivi
    Via, Allegra
    Kahlem, Pascal
    Rustici, Gabriella
    van Gelder, Celia W. G.
    Palagi, Patricia M.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 16 (05)
  • [2] Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community
    Belliard, Frederique
    Maineri, Angelica Maria
    Plomp, Esther
    Ramos Padilla, Andres Felipe
    Sun, Junzi
    Zare Jeddi, Maryam
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2023, 19 (12)
  • [3] Ten simple rules for making good oral presentations
    Bourne, Philip E.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 3 (04) : 593 - 594
  • [4] Ten Simple Rules for Writing a PLOS Ten Simple Rules Article
    Dashnow, Harriet
    Lonsdale, Andrew
    Bourne, Philip E.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (10)
  • [5] Ten simple rules for more objective decision-making
    Fletcher, Anthony C.
    Wagner, Georges A.
    Bourne, Philip E.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 16 (04)
  • [6] Ten simple rules for making research software more robust
    Taschuk, Morgan
    Wilson, Greg
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (04)
  • [7] Ten simple rules for making a software tool workflow-ready
    Brack, Paul
    Crowther, Peter
    Soiland-Reyes, Stian
    Owen, Stuart
    Lowe, Douglas
    Williams, Alan R.
    Groom, Quentin
    Dillen, Mathias
    Coppens, Frederik
    Gruening, Bjorn
    Eguinoa, Ignacio
    Ewels, Philip
    Goble, Carole
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2022, 18 (03)
  • [8] Ten simple rules for reviewers
    Bourne, Philip E.
    Korngreen, Alon
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 2 (09) : 973 - 974
  • [9] Ten Simple Rules for Better Figures
    Rougier, Nicolas P.
    Droettboom, Michael
    Bourne, Philip E.
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (09)
  • [10] Ten simple rules for structuring papers
    Mensh, Brett
    Kording, Konrad
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 13 (09)