Source characterization of highly oxidized multifunctional compounds in a boreal forest environment using positive matrix factorization

被引:112
|
作者
Yan, Chao [1 ]
Nie, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Aijala, Mikko [1 ]
Rissanen, Matti P. [1 ]
Canagaratna, Manjula R. [3 ]
Massoli, Paola [3 ]
Junninen, Heikki [1 ]
Jokinen, Tuija [1 ,6 ]
Sarnela, Nina [1 ]
Hame, Silja A. K. [1 ]
Schobesberger, Siegfried [1 ,7 ]
Canonaco, Francesco [4 ]
Yao, Lei [5 ]
Prevot, Andre S. H. [4 ]
Petaja, Tuukka [1 ,2 ]
Kulmala, Markku [1 ]
Sipila, Mikko [1 ]
Worsnop, Douglas R. [1 ,3 ]
Ehn, Mikael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Phys, Helsinki 00140, Finland
[2] Nanjing Univ, Sch Atmospher Sci, Joint Int Res Lab Atmospher & Earth Syst Sci, Nanjing 210046, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Aerodyne Res Inc, Billerica, MA 01821 USA
[4] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Atmospher Chem, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[5] Fudan Univ, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai Key Lab Atmospher Particle Pollut & Prev, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Chem, Irvine, CA 92617 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 芬兰科学院; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
MASS-SPECTROMETER; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOL; PARTICLE FORMATION; SULFURIC-ACID; PRODUCTS; COMPONENTS; ORIGIN;
D O I
10.5194/acp-16-12715-2016
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Highly oxidized multifunctional compounds (HOMs) have been demonstrated to be important for atmospheric secondary organic aerosols (SOA) and new-particle formation (NPF), yet it remains unclear which the main atmospheric HOM formation pathways are. In this study, a nitrate-ion-based chemical ionization atmospheric-pressure-interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (CI-APi-TOF) was deployed to measure HOMs in the boreal forest in Hyytiala, southern Finland. Positive matrix factorization (PMF) was applied to separate the detected HOM species into several factors, relating these "factors" to plausible formation pathways. PMF was performed with a revised error estimation derived from laboratory data, which agrees well with an estimate based on ambient data. Three factors explained the majority (> 95 %) of the data variation, but the optimal solution found six factors, including two night-time factors, three daytime factors, and a transport factor. One nighttime factor is almost identical to laboratory spectra generated from monoterpene ozonolysis, while the second likely represents monoterpene oxidation initiated by NO3. The exact chemical processes forming the different daytime factors remain unclear, but they all have clearly distinct diurnal profiles, very likely related to monoterpene oxidation with a strong influence from NO, presumably through its effect on peroxy radical (RO2 / chemistry. Apart from these five "local" factors, the sixth factor is interpreted as a transport related factor. These findings improve our understanding of HOM production by confirming current knowledge and inspiring future research directions and provide new perspectives on using factorization methods to understand short-lived atmospheric species.
引用
收藏
页码:12715 / 12731
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing volatile organic compound sources in a boreal forest using positive matrix factorization (PMF)
    Vestenius, M.
    Hopke, P. K.
    Lehtipalo, K.
    Petaja, T.
    Hakola, H.
    Hellen, H.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 259
  • [2] Source apportionment of exposure to toxic volatile organic compounds using positive matrix factorization
    Anderson, MJ
    Miller, SL
    Milford, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (04): : 295 - 307
  • [3] Source apportionment of exposure to toxic volatile organic compounds using positive matrix factorization
    MELISSA J ANDERSON
    SHELLY L MILLER
    JANA B MILFORD
    [J]. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2001, 11 : 295 - 307
  • [4] Modeling the role of highly oxidized multifunctional organic molecules for the growth of new particles over the boreal forest region
    Ostrom, Emilie
    Putian, Zhou
    Schurgers, Guy
    Mishurov, Mikhail
    Kivekas, Niku
    Lihavainen, Heikki
    Ehn, Mikael
    Rissanen, Matti P.
    Kurten, Theo
    Boy, Michael
    Swietlicki, Erik
    Roldin, Pontus
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2017, 17 (14) : 8887 - 8901
  • [5] Source identifications of airborne fine particles using positive matrix factorization and US environmental protection agency positive matrix factorization
    Kim, Eugene
    Hopke, Philip K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2007, 57 (07) : 811 - 819
  • [6] Source Apportionment of Groundwater Pollution using Unmix and Positive Matrix Factorization
    Mohammad Shahid Gulgundi
    Amba Shetty
    [J]. Environmental Processes, 2019, 6 : 457 - 473
  • [7] Pollution source apportionment using a priori information and positive matrix factorization
    Lingwall, Jeff W.
    Christensen, William F.
    [J]. CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2007, 87 (02) : 281 - 294
  • [8] Source Apportionment of Groundwater Pollution using Unmix and Positive Matrix Factorization
    Gulgundi, Mohammad Shahid
    Shetty, Amba
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (02): : 457 - 473
  • [9] Chemical characterization of PM1.0 aerosol in Delhi and source apportionment using positive matrix factorization
    Jaiprakash
    Singhai, Amrita
    Habib, Gazala
    Raman, Ramya Sunder
    Gupta, Tarun
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (01) : 445 - 462
  • [10] Chemical characterization of PM1.0 aerosol in Delhi and source apportionment using positive matrix factorization
    Amrita Jaiprakash
    Gazala Singhai
    Ramya Sunder Habib
    Tarun Raman
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24 : 445 - 462