A snowball Earth versus a slushball Earth: Results from Neoproterozoic climate modeling sensitivity experiments

被引:35
|
作者
Micheels, Arne [1 ]
Montenari, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Senckenberg Res Inst, D-60325 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Keele, Newcastle ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
来源
GEOSPHERE | 2008年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
neoproterozoic; snowball Earth; climate modeling; climate modeling sensitivity experiment;
D O I
10.1130/GES00098.1
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The Neoproterozoic was characterized by an extreme glaciation, but until now there has been no consensus as to whether it was a complete glaciation (snowball Earth) or a less severe glaciation (slushball Earth). We performed sensitivity experiments with an Earth model of intermediate complexity for this period of dramatic global cooling. Our simulations focus on the climate response on a cool versus a cold ocean, on a desert versus a glacier land surface, and on a lower versus a higher CO2 concentration. All Neoproterozoic model experiments represent much colder conditions than today and widespread glaciation. In case of an initial forcing representing a snowball Earth, the model maintains its complete glaciation, and temperatures are as low as -45 degrees C in equatorial latitudes. At the poles, the snowball experiments demonstrate annual average temperatures of < -70 degrees C. If the initial model forcing is more moderate (slushball Earth), polar temperatures are < -50 degrees C, but temperatures in low latitudes stay well above the freezing point of water, and therefore ice-free ocean areas remain. Based on our simulations, we are able to observe that global climate reacts less sensitively to reductions of atmospheric CO2 during times with increased glaciations. Our results suggest that the development of glaciers on land contributes significantly to intense ice coverage of the oceans. Because simulations initialized without complete ice cover do not reach the global glaciation condition, we conclude that our simulations support the rather moderate scenario of a slushball Earth than the extreme snowball Earth hypothesis. The experimental design and the model might, however, limit the interpretation of our results.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 410
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Snowball versus slushball Earth: Dynamic versus nondynamic sea ice?
    Lewis, J. P.
    Weaver, A. J.
    Eby, M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2007, 112 (C11)
  • [2] A Neoproterozoic snowball earth
    Hoffman, PF
    Kaufman, AJ
    Halverson, GP
    Schrag, DP
    SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5381) : 1342 - 1346
  • [3] Why was there a Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth?
    Retallack, Gregory J.
    PRECAMBRIAN RESEARCH, 2023, 385
  • [4] Freezing and unfreezing of the Neoproterozoic snowball Earth:: From field evidence to climate models
    Nedelec, Anne
    Ramstein, Gilles
    Laskar, Jacques
    COMPTES RENDUS GEOSCIENCE, 2007, 339 (3-4) : 181 - 185
  • [5] The biotic response to neoproterozoic snowball earth
    Corsetti, FA
    Olcott, AN
    Bakermans, C
    PALAEOGEOGRAPHY PALAEOCLIMATOLOGY PALAEOECOLOGY, 2006, 232 (2-4) : 114 - 130
  • [6] Life During Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth
    Corsetti, Frank A.
    GEOLOGY, 2015, 43 (06) : 559 - 560
  • [7] Neoproterozoic loess and limits to snowball Earth
    Retallack, Gregory J.
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 168 (02) : 289 - 307
  • [8] Neoproterozoic 'snowball Earth' glaciations and the evolution of altruism
    Boyle, R. A.
    Lenton, T. M.
    Williams, H. T. P.
    GEOBIOLOGY, 2007, 5 (04) : 337 - 349
  • [9] Neoproterozoic 'snowball earth' and the 'cap' carbonate controversy
    Sankaran, AV
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2003, 84 (07): : 871 - 873
  • [10] Testing paleogeographic controls on a Neoproterozoic snowball Earth
    Poulsen, CJ
    Jacob, RL
    Pierrehumbert, RT
    Huynh, TT
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2002, 29 (11) : 10 - 1