Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens

被引:38
|
作者
Stewart, DA
Guo, D
Morris, D
Poon, MC
Ruether, BA
Jones, AR
Klassen, J
Auer, I
Luider, J
Chaudhry, A
Brown, C
Russell, JA
机构
[1] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[2] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[3] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Dept Hematol, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[4] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Dept Apheresis, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[5] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Dept Flow Cytometry, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[6] Foothills Hosp, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, Alberta Bone Marrow Transplant Program, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; hematopoietic stem cells; DICEP;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bmt.1701536
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
The study purpose was to determine if G-CSF plus dose-intensive cyclophosphamide 5.25 g/m(2), etoposide 1.05 g/m(2) and cisplatin 105 mg/m(2) (DICEP) results in superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization (BSCM) than less intensive chemotherapy. From January 1993 until May 1997, 152 consecutive patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 55), breast cancer (n = 47), Hodgkin's disease (n = 14), multiple myeloma (n = 9), AML (n = 9), or other cancers (n = 18) initially underwent BSCM by one of three methods: Group 1: G-CSF alone x 4 days (n = 30). Group 2: disease-oriented chemotherapy, dosed to avoid blood transfusions, followed by G-CSF starting day 7 or 8, and apheresis day 13 or 14 (n = 82). Group 3: DICEP days 1-3, G-CSF starting day 14, and apheresis planned day 19, 20 or 21 (n = 40). A multivariate analysis nas performed to determine which factors independently predicted BSCM. The median peripheral blood CD34(+) (PB CD34(+)) cell count the morning of apheresis linearly correlated with the number of CD34(+) cells removed per litre of apheresis that day. The median PB CD34(+) cell count and median CD34(+) cells x 10(6) removed per litre of apheresis were highest for Group 3, intermediate for Group 2, and lowest for Group 1. By multivariate analysis, mobilization group (3 > 2 > 1), disease other than AML, no prior melphalan or mitomycin-C, and less than two prior chemotherapy regimens predicted better BSCM. Out of 15 Group 3 patients who had infiltrated marrows, 11 had no detectable cancer in marrow and apheresis products after DICEP. These data suggest that DICEP results in superior BSCM than less intensive chemotherapy regimens.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization from dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin plus G-CSF than from less intensive chemotherapy regimens
    DA Stewart
    D Guo
    D Morris
    M-C Poon
    BA Ruether
    AR Jones
    J Klassen
    I Auer
    J Luider
    A Chaudhry
    C Brown
    JA Russell
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 1999, 23 : 111 - 117
  • [2] Superior autologous blood stem cell mobilization (BSCM) with dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin (DICEP) plus G-CSF than with less intensive chemotherapy (CT) plus G-CSF
    Stewart, DA
    Guo, D
    Brown, C
    Poon, MC
    Ruether, B
    Jones, A
    Klassen, J
    Luider, J
    Morris, D
    Chaudhry, A
    Russell, JA
    BLOOD, 1997, 90 (10) : 433 - 433
  • [3] SEQUENTIAL GM-CSF AND G-CSF ALLOW REPEATED CYCLES OF DOSE-INTENSIVE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE, ETOPOSIDE, AND CISPLATIN (DICEP) WITH ACCEPTABLE HEMATOLOGIC TOXICITY
    NEIDHART, J
    FERGUSON, J
    PARSONS, A
    HERMAN, T
    SAIKI, J
    MANGALIK, A
    BLOOD, 1993, 82 (10) : A503 - A503
  • [4] Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    Sung, A. D.
    Grima, D. T.
    Bernard, L. M.
    Brown, S.
    Carrum, G.
    Holmberg, L.
    Horwitz, M. E.
    Liesveld, J. L.
    Kanda, J.
    McClune, B.
    Shaughnessy, P.
    Tricot, G. J.
    Chao, N. J.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 48 (11) : 1444 - 1449
  • [5] Outcomes and costs of autologous stem cell mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF vs G-CSF alone
    A D Sung
    D T Grima
    L M Bernard
    S Brown
    G Carrum
    L Holmberg
    M E Horwitz
    J L Liesveld
    J Kanda
    B McClune
    P Shaughnessy
    G J Tricot
    N J Chao
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2013, 48 : 1444 - 1449
  • [6] G-CSF plus /- PLERIXAFOR IS SUPERIOR TO CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE plus G/GM-CSF FOR AUTOLOGOUS HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS (AHSC) MOBILIZATION
    Miller, A. N.
    Hogan, K. R.
    Alexander, E.
    Schaub, C.
    Fouts, T.
    Stuart, R. K.
    Costa, L. J.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (02) : S204 - S204
  • [7] Dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and platinum (DICEP) as a priming/mobilization regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvesting prior to high dose chemotherapy (HDC).
    Jennis, A
    Pecora, AL
    Isaacs, RE
    Cantwell, S
    Michelis, AM
    Zahos, K
    BLOOD, 1996, 88 (10) : 1605 - 1605
  • [8] COMPARISON OF HIGH-DOSE CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE PLUS G-CSF WITH G-CSF ALONE FOR PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL MOBILIZATION IN MM
    Jang, J. E.
    Hyun, S. Y.
    Hwang, D. Y.
    Yoon, S. H.
    Kim, Y. D.
    Kim, S. J.
    Kim, J. S.
    Cheong, J. -W.
    Min, Y. H.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 : 83 - 83
  • [9] Intensive dose ifosfamide and etoposide with G-CSF for stem cell mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
    Donato, ML
    Champlin, RE
    Van Besien, KW
    Korbling, M
    Cabanillas, F
    Anderlini, P
    Gajewski, JG
    Lauppe, J
    Durett, A
    Andersson, B
    Giralt, S
    Khouri, I
    Hagemeister, F
    Romaguera, JE
    Sarris, A
    McLaughlin, P
    Younes, A
    Ippoliti, C
    Blamble, DA
    Hester, J
    Gee, A
    Rodriguez, MA
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 1999, 35 (3-4) : 317 - 324
  • [10] Cytarabine plus G-CSF is more effective than cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF as a stem cell mobilization regimen in multiple myeloma
    Jelinek, Tomas
    Adamusova, Lucie
    Popkova, Tereza
    Tvrda, Ivana
    Smejkalova, Jana
    Simicek, Michal
    Salounova, Dana
    Kascak, Michal
    Mihalyova, Jana
    Plonkova, Hana
    Duras, Juraj
    Navratil, Milan
    Hajek, Roman
    Koristek, Zdenek
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 54 (07) : 1107 - 1114