A quantitative exploration of efficacy of gland morphology in prostate cancer grading

被引:10
|
作者
Naik, Shivang [1 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [1 ]
Tomaszeweski, John [2 ]
Feldman, Michael D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Surg Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/NEBC.2007.4413278
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Currently, prostate cancer diagnosis is done qualitatively by pathologists who visually analyze tissue architecture while largely ignoring gland morphology. In this study we have developed an automated image analysis scheme for grading prostate cancer by quantitatively analyzing morphological features of individual glands from digitized histological images. Following automated gland boundary segmentation via level sets, 7 boundary features are extracted. Non-linear dimensionality reduction is then applied to the set of extracted features. A Support vector machine (SVM) classifier is then used to classify tissue patches corresponding to benign epithelium, and prostate cancer grades 3 and 4 in a lower dimensional embedding space. We obtained an accuracy of 75.00% in distinguishing benign epithelium and grade 3, 85.71% between benign epithelium and grade 4, and 72.73% between grade 3 and grade 4. Our results strongly suggest that quantitative analysis of gland boundary morphology may play a significant clinical role in distinguishing different prostate cancer Gleason grades.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    M. Boschheidgen
    L. Schimmöller
    C. Arsov
    F. Ziayee
    J. Morawitz
    B. Valentin
    K. L. Radke
    M. Giessing
    I. Esposito
    P. Albers
    G. Antoch
    T. Ullrich
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 2351 - 2359
  • [32] Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future
    Matoso, Andres
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 17 (03) : 1 - 6
  • [33] Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading
    Egevad, Lars
    Delahunt, Brett
    Yaxley, John
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 69 (02) : 55 - 66
  • [34] HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A PERSPECTIVE
    GLEASON, DF
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [35] STUDY ON INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY OF PROSTATE CANCER GRADING
    Nyk, L.
    Dzik, T.
    Wysocki, M.
    Borowka, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 656 - 656
  • [36] An Introduction to the New Grading System for Prostate Cancer
    Berney, D. M.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2016, 240 : 9 - 9
  • [37] Exploration of clinical preferences in treatment planning of radiotherapy for prostate cancer using Pareto fronts and clinical grading analysis
    Kyroudi, A.
    Petersson, K.
    Ozsahin, E.
    Bourhis, J.
    Bochud, F.
    Moeckli, R.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 82 - 86
  • [38] In Vivo Tumor Grading of Prostate Cancer Using Quantitative 111In-Capromab Pendetide SPECT/CT
    Seo, Youngho
    Aparici, Carina Mari
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Hawkins, Randall A.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [39] Elastography in prostate gland imaging and prostate cancer detection
    Tyloch, Dominik
    Tyloch, Janusz
    Adamowicz, Jan
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Ostrowski, Adam
    Warsinski, Patryk
    Wilamowski, Jacek
    Ludwikowska, Joanna
    Drewa, Tomasz
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2018, 20 (04) : 515 - 523
  • [40] QUANTITATIVE CHANGES IN THE MORPHOLOGY OF THE AGING CANINE PROSTATE
    ZIRKIN, BR
    STRANDBERG, JD
    ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1984, 208 (02): : 207 - 214