A quantitative exploration of efficacy of gland morphology in prostate cancer grading

被引:10
|
作者
Naik, Shivang [1 ]
Madabhushi, Anant [1 ]
Tomaszeweski, John [2 ]
Feldman, Michael D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Surg Pathol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1109/NEBC.2007.4413278
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Currently, prostate cancer diagnosis is done qualitatively by pathologists who visually analyze tissue architecture while largely ignoring gland morphology. In this study we have developed an automated image analysis scheme for grading prostate cancer by quantitatively analyzing morphological features of individual glands from digitized histological images. Following automated gland boundary segmentation via level sets, 7 boundary features are extracted. Non-linear dimensionality reduction is then applied to the set of extracted features. A Support vector machine (SVM) classifier is then used to classify tissue patches corresponding to benign epithelium, and prostate cancer grades 3 and 4 in a lower dimensional embedding space. We obtained an accuracy of 75.00% in distinguishing benign epithelium and grade 3, 85.71% between benign epithelium and grade 4, and 72.73% between grade 3 and grade 4. Our results strongly suggest that quantitative analysis of gland boundary morphology may play a significant clinical role in distinguishing different prostate cancer Gleason grades.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Confirmation bias in prostate cancer grading
    Fandel, Thomas M.
    Pfnuer, Maria
    Corinth, Claudia
    Ansorge, Michael
    Melchior, Sebastian W.
    Thuroff, Joachim In
    Lehr, Hans-Anton
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04): : 250 - 250
  • [22] Prostate Cancer Grading: A Contemporary Photomontage
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (01) : 137 - 137
  • [23] CLASSIFICATION AND GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    LORENZ, G
    WARZOK, R
    KLEBINGAT, KJ
    FIEDLER, R
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE MEDIZIN-ZKM, 1988, 43 (21): : 1863 - 1867
  • [24] NUCLEAR ROUNDNESS, A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO GRADING IN PROSTATE-CANCER, AND ITS USE IN BIOPSY SPECIMENS
    CLARK, TD
    ASKIN, FB
    WEISSMAN, RM
    BAGNELL, CR
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1985, 52 (01) : A14 - A15
  • [25] Quantitative Analysis of Benign and Malignant Tumors in Histopathology: Predicting Prostate Cancer Grading Using SVM
    Bhattacharjee, Subrata
    Park, Hyeon-Gyun
    Kim, Cho-Hee
    Prakash, Deekshitha
    Madusanka, Nuwan
    So, Jae-Hong
    Cho, Nam-Hoon
    Choi, Heung-Kook
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2019, 9 (15):
  • [26] Prostate Malignancy Grading using Gland-related Shape Descriptors
    Braumann, Ulf-Dietrich
    Scheibe, Patrick
    Loeffler, Markus
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Wernert, Nicolas
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: DIGITAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 9041
  • [27] Current perspectives on Gleason grading of prostate cancer
    Iczkowski K.A.
    Lucia M.S.
    Current Urology Reports, 2011, 12 (3) : 216 - 222
  • [28] Grading of Prostate Cancer: Past, Present, and Future
    Andres Matoso
    Jonathan I. Epstein
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17
  • [29] Current Perspectives on the Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer
    Shah, Rajal B.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 133 (11) : 1810 - 1816
  • [30] MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Boschheidgen, M.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Arsov, C.
    Ziayee, F.
    Morawitz, J.
    Valentin, B.
    Radke, K. L.
    Giessing, M.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Ullrich, T.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) : 2351 - 2359