Olfactory recovery following infection with COVID-19: A systematic review

被引:36
|
作者
Jafar, Ali [1 ]
Lasso, Andrea [2 ]
Shorr, Risa [3 ]
Hutton, Brian [4 ]
Kilty, Shaun [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst OHRI, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Ottawa Hosp, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol Publ Hlth & Preventat Med, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst OHRI, Knowledge Synth Unit, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst OHRI, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 11期
关键词
SMELL; TASTE; DYSFUNCTION; SENSE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0259321
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Olfactory loss has been identified as one of the common symptoms related to COVID-19 infection. Although olfactory loss is recognized, our understanding of both the extent of loss and time to olfactory recovery following infection is less well known. Similarly, knowledge of potential impactful patient factors and therapies that influence olfactory recovery is desirable but is not overtly clear in the literature. Our systematic review sought to fill this knowledge gap. We included studies that: involved either an observational or an interventional design that reported data on patients with olfactory dysfunction due to Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) diagnosed COVID-19 infection; and reported data regarding olfactory recovery measured by an objective olfactory test, Likert scale and/or visual analog scale (VAS). The study methods were determined a priori and registered in PROSPERO (Registration Number CRD42020204354). An information specialist searched Medline, Embase, LitCovid and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2021, and two reviewers were involved in all aspects of study selection and data collection. After screening 2788 citations, a total of 44 studies of assorted observational designs were included. Patients had undergone objective COVID-19 testing, and most were adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19. Olfactory recovery was found to occur as early as 7 days, with most patients recovering olfaction within 30 days. Few studies included prolonged follow-up to 6 months or longer duration. Poor olfaction at initial presentation was associated with poor recovery rates. Only a small number of studies assessed olfactory retraining and steroid therapy. Additional trials are underway.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of olfactory training for chronic olfactory disorder following COVID-19: a systematic review
    Treder-Rochna, Natalia
    Mankowska, Aleksandra
    Kujawa, Wiktoria
    Harciarek, Michal
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [2] Recovery rates and long-term olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection
    Dias, Melanie
    Shaida, Zara
    Haloob, Nora
    Hopkins, Claire
    WORLD JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 10 (02): : 121 - 128
  • [3] Recovery rates and long-term olfactory dysfunction following COVID-19 infection
    Dias Melanie
    Shaida Zara
    Haloob Nora
    Hopkins Claire
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志(英文), 2024, 10 (02)
  • [4] Olfactory and taste disorders in COVID-19: a systematic review
    da Costa, Klinger V. T.
    Lins Carnauba, Aline Tenorio
    Rocha, Katianne Wanderley
    Lira de Andrade, Kelly Cristina
    Ferreira, Sonia M. S.
    Menezes, Pedro de L.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 86 (06) : 781 - 792
  • [5] Treatments for Olfactory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Systematic Review
    Mehraeen, Esmaeil
    Yarmohammadi, Soudabeh
    Mirzapour, Pegah
    Zadeh, Seyed Saeed Tamehri
    Dehghani, Soheil
    Molaeipour, Leila
    Molla, Ayoob
    Karimi, Elaheh
    Abbaspour, Faeze
    SeyedAlinaghi, SeyedAhmad
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2024, 28 (03) : e517 - e522
  • [6] Return to Play Following COVID-19 Infection -A Systematic Review of Current Evidence
    Davey, Martin S.
    Davey, Matthew G.
    Hurley, Robert
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2022, 31 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [7] The reactivation of the various types of viruses following COVID-19 infection: a systematic review
    Naderi, Maziar
    Naderi, Mohieddin
    Jamal, Mahboob Keramati
    Past, Vida
    Esmaeili, Arezoo
    Khabazian, Aynaz
    Abadi, Somayeh Hashemi Ali
    Saremi, Golbarg
    Asghari, Shima
    Moghimi, Shadi
    Parnianfard, Neda
    Parnianfard, Mina
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2025,
  • [8] Treatment of COVID-19 Associated Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review
    Bischoff, Sabrina
    Moyaert, Mathilde
    Clijsters, Marnick
    Vanderbroek, Annabelle
    Van Gerven, Laura
    CURRENT ALLERGY AND ASTHMA REPORTS, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [9] Fulminant Myocarditis and Cardiogenic Shock Following COVID-19 Infection Versus COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Literature Review
    Guglin, Maya E.
    Etuk, Aniekeme
    Shah, Chirag
    Ilonze, Onyedika J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [10] Reported risk factors for COVID-19 infection in healthcare workers: A systematic review COVID-19 infection in healthcare workers: A systematic review
    Ferreira, Wellington Batista
    de Souza, Marina Batista Chaves Azevedo
    da Silva, Carla Aparecida Alves
    da Silva, Jully Emmilly Guedes
    de Oliveira e Silva, Ana Cristina
    Alonso, Carolina Maria do Carmo
    de Barros, Marcia Maria Mont'Alverne
    Rodrigues, Daniela da Silva
    de Lima, Ana Carollyne Dantas
    da Costa, Victor Bernardes Barroso
    Barroso, Barbara Iansa de Lima
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2024, 178