Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients

被引:8
|
作者
Brunner, Thomas B. [1 ,2 ]
Sauer, Rolf [1 ]
Fietkau, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Gray Inst Radiat Oncol & Biol, Oxford OX3 7DQ, England
来源
RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2011年 / 6卷
关键词
Pancreatic cancer; chemoradiotherapy; gemcitabine; 5-fluorouracil; COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; PHASE-I TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; MITOMYCIN-C; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; CELL-LINES; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-6-88
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Despite of a growing number of gemcitabine based chemoradiotherapy studies in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), 5-fluorouracil based regimens are still regarded to be standard and the debate of superiority between the two drugs is going on. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the effect of two concurrent chemoradiotherapy regimens using 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine to compare their effect and tolerance. Methods: We have performed a single centre retrospective analysis of 93 patients treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy of 55.8 Gray using either concurrent 5-fluorouracil, 1 g/m(2) on days 1-5 and 29-33 of radiotherapy and 10 mg/m(2) of mitomycin C on day 1, 29 of radiotherapy (FM group, 35 patients) versus gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin, (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 (GC group, 58 patients). Primary endpoint was the median overall survival (OS) rate. Results: The median OS rate was 12.7 months in the GC group and 9.7 months in the FM group. The 1-year OS rate was 53% versus 40%, respectively (p = 0.009). GC led to more grade 3 leukocytopenia and thrombocytopenia than FM, but not to more grade 4 myelosuppression. Thrombocytopenia was the most frequently observed grade 4 toxicity in both groups (11% after FM versus 12% after GC). No grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was observed. Grade 3 nausea was more common in the FM group (20% versus 9%) and grade 4 nausea was observed in one patient per group only. Conclusions: GC was superior to FM for overall survival and both regimens were similar in terms of tolerance. We conclude that GC leads to encouraging results and that the use of FM for chemoradiotherapy in LAPC cannot be recommended without concerns.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients
    Thomas B Brunner
    Rolf Sauer
    Rainer Fietkau
    Radiation Oncology, 6
  • [2] Concurrent Full Dose Gemcitabine versus Concurrent 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Rakhra, S. S.
    Chung, A.
    Helenowski, I.
    Mulcahy, M.
    Hayes, J.
    Small, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S337 - S337
  • [3] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study
    Li, CP
    Chao, Y
    Chi, KH
    Chan, WK
    Teng, HC
    Lee, RC
    Chang, FY
    Lee, SD
    Yen, SH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (01): : 98 - 104
  • [4] Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yeon-Joo Kim
    Woo Jin Lee
    Sang Myung Woo
    Tae Hyun Kim
    Sung Sik Han
    Bo Hyun Kim
    Sung Ho Moon
    Sang Soo Kim
    Young Hwan Koh
    Sang Jae Park
    Joo Young Kim
    Dae Yong Kim
    Joong Won Park
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [5] Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Woo, Sang Myung
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Han, Sung-Sik
    Kim, Bo Hyun
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Sang Soo
    Koh, Young Hwan
    Park, Sang-Jae
    Kim, Joo-Young
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Park, Joong-Won
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [6] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study. Response
    Crane, CH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (03): : 1009 - 1009
  • [7] Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Taira, Koichi
    Boku, Narikazu
    Fukutomi, Akira
    Onozawa, Yusuke
    Hironaka, Shuichi
    Yoshino, Takayuki
    Yasui, Hirofumi
    Yamazaki, Kentaro
    Taku, Keisei
    Hashimoto, Takayuki
    Nishimura, Tetsuo
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 43 (11) : 875 - 880
  • [8] Results of a retrospective analysis of gemcitabine as a second-line treatment after chemoradiotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Koichi Taira
    Narikazu Boku
    Akira Fukutomi
    Yusuke Onozawa
    Shuichi Hironaka
    Takayuki Yoshino
    Hirofumi Yasui
    Kentaro Yamazaki
    Keisei Taku
    Takayuki Hashimoto
    Tetsuo Nishimura
    Journal of Gastroenterology, 2008, 43 : 875 - 880
  • [9] Sequential chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer
    Janinis, J
    Papadakou, M
    Panagos, G
    Panousaki, A
    Georgoulias, V
    Hatzidaki, D
    Lefantzis, D
    Dokianakis, G
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 24 (03): : 227 - 231
  • [10] Chemoradiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without sequential chemotherapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin vs chemoradiotherapy with concurrent 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer - a multi-centre randomised phase II study
    Wilkowski, R.
    Boeck, S.
    Ostermaier, S.
    Sauer, R.
    Herbst, M.
    Fietkau, R.
    Flentje, M.
    Miethe, S.
    Boettcher, H. D.
    Scholten, T.
    Bruns, C. J.
    Rau, H. G.
    Hinke, A.
    Heinemann, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 101 (11) : 1853 - 1859