PIPS: A Parallel Planning Model of Sentence Production

被引:2
|
作者
Brehm, Laurel [1 ]
Cho, Pyeong Whan [2 ]
Smolensky, Paul [3 ,4 ]
Goldrick, Matthew A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, POB 310, NL-6500 AH Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Cognit Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Microsoft Res AI, Cambridge, MA USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Linguist, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Sentence production; Gradient symbolic computation; Agreement production; Symbolic connectionist modeling; SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT; NUMBER AGREEMENT; WORKING-MEMORY; LANGUAGE PRODUCTION; CONFLICTING CUES; NOTIONAL NUMBER; LEXICAL ACCESS; WORD-ORDER; ATTRACTION; ENGLISH;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.13079
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Subject-verb agreement errors are common in sentence production. Many studies have used experimental paradigms targeting the production of subject-verb agreement from a sentence preamble (The key to the cabinets) and eliciting verb errors ( horizontal ellipsis *were shiny). Through reanalysis of previous data (50 experiments; 102,369 observations), we show that this paradigm also results in many errors in preamble repetition, particularly of local noun number (The key to the *cabinet). We explore the mechanisms of both errors in parallelism in producing syntax (PIPS), a model in the Gradient Symbolic Computation framework. PIPS models sentence production using a continuous-state stochastic dynamical system that optimizes grammatical constraints (shaped by previous experience) over vector representations of symbolic structures. At intermediate stages in the computation, grammatical constraints allow multiple competing parses to be partially activated, resulting in stable but transient conjunctive blend states. In the context of the preamble completion task, memory constraints reduce the strength of the target structure, allowing for co-activation of non-target parses where the local noun controls the verb (notional agreement and locally agreeing relative clauses) and non-target parses that include structural constituents with contrasting number specifications (e.g., plural instead of singular local noun). Simulations of the preamble completion task reveal that these partially activated non-target parses, as well the need to balance accurate encoding of lexical and syntactic aspects of the prompt, result in errors. In other words: Because sentence processing is embedded in a processor with finite memory and prior experience with production, interference from non-target production plans causes errors.
引用
收藏
页数:49
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tracking Sentence Planning and Production
    Kemper, Susan
    Bontempo, Daniel
    McKedy, Whitney
    Schmalzried, RaLynn
    Tagliaferri, Bruno
    Kieweg, Doug
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2011, 66 (02): : 160 - 168
  • [2] PLANNING AND PROSODIC STRUCTURE IN SENTENCE PRODUCTION
    FERREIRA, F
    CLIFTON, C
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1987, 25 (05) : 323 - 323
  • [3] Phonological advance planning in sentence production
    Oppermann, Frank
    Jescheniak, Joerg D.
    Schriefers, Herbert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 469 - 469
  • [4] PLANNING UNITS AND SYNTAX IN SENTENCE PRODUCTION
    FORD, M
    HOLMES, VM
    [J]. COGNITION, 1978, 6 (01) : 35 - 53
  • [5] Planning multiple dependencies in sentence production
    Momma, Shota
    Yoshida, Masaya
    [J]. LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 38 (09) : 1183 - 1213
  • [6] Phonological advance planning in sentence production
    Oppermann, Frank
    Jescheniak, Joerg D.
    Schriefers, Herbert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 63 (04) : 526 - 540
  • [7] Planning in sentence production: Evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope
    Martin, Randi C.
    Crowther, Jason E.
    Knight, Meredith
    Tamborello, Franklin P., II
    Yang, Chin-Lung
    [J]. COGNITION, 2010, 116 (02) : 177 - 192
  • [8] Advance Planning in Written and Spoken Sentence Production
    Roeser, Jens
    Torrance, Mark
    Baguley, Thom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2019, 45 (11) : 1983 - 2009
  • [9] Planning at the phonological level during sentence production
    Schnur, TT
    Costa, A
    Caramazza, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2006, 35 (02) : 189 - 213
  • [10] Working memory and planning during sentence production
    Martin, Randi C.
    Yan, Hao
    Schnur, Tatiana T.
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2014, 152 : 120 - 132