COMPLEX NETWORK ANALYSIS OF LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC TEXTS

被引:24
|
作者
Grabska-Gradzinska, Iwona [1 ]
Kulig, Andrzej [2 ]
Kwapien, Jaroslaw [2 ]
Drozdz, Stanislaw [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Fac Phys Astron & Appl Comp Sci, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Nucl Phys, PL-31342 Krakow, Poland
[3] Cracow Univ Technol, Fac Phys Math & Comp Sci, PL-31155 Krakow, Poland
来源
关键词
Complex networks; Zipf law; natural language; EVOLUTION; LANGUAGE;
D O I
10.1142/S0129183112500519
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
We present results from our quantitative study of statistical and network properties of literary and scientific texts written in two languages: English and Polish. We show that Polish texts are described by the Zipf law with the scaling exponent smaller than the one for the English language. We also show that the scientific texts are typically characterized by the rank-frequency plots with relatively short range of power-law behavior as compared to the literary texts. We then transform the texts into their word-adjacency network representations and find another difference between the languages. For the majority of the literary texts in both languages, the corresponding networks revealed the scale-free structure, while this was not always the case for the scientific texts. However, all the network representations of texts were hierarchical. We do not observe any qualitative and quantitative difference between the languages. However, if we look at other network statistics like the clustering coefficient and the average shortest path length, the English texts occur to possess more clustered structure than do the Polish ones. This result was attributed to differences in grammar of both languages, which was also indicated in the Zipf plots. All the texts, however, show network structure that differs from any of the Watts-Strogatz, the Barabasi-Albert, and the Erdos-Renyi architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ACCURACY, MISCUES, AND THE COMPREHENSION OF COMPLEX LITERARY AND SCIENTIFIC TEXTS
    Kucer, Stephen B.
    [J]. READING PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 37 (07) : 1076 - 1095
  • [2] TEMPORAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF LITERARY TEXTS
    Prado, Sandra D.
    Dahmen, Silvio R.
    Bazzan, Ana L. C.
    Mac Carron, Padraig
    Kenna, Ralph
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPLEX SYSTEMS, 2016, 19 (03):
  • [3] Preferences for literary and scientific texts according to the university degree
    Sanchez Bejerano, Lucia
    Perez Fernandez, Lucila Maria
    Lori Griffin, Kim
    [J]. DIDACTICA-LENGUA Y LITERATURA, 2022, 34 : 147 - 159
  • [4] Introduction to the analysis of literary texts
    Ousselin, Edward
    [J]. FRENCH REVIEW, 2024, 97 (03):
  • [5] Texts and interpretation: Introduction to literary analysis
    Diez Lloris, Irene
    [J]. CASTILLA-ESTUDIOS DE LITERATURA, 2014, 5 : CXXII - CXXIV
  • [6] Texts and interpretation: introduction to literary analysis
    Camarero, Jesus
    [J]. MONTEAGUDO, 2018, (23): : 275 - 278
  • [7] Readability Analysis of Bengali Literary Texts
    Phani, Shanta
    Lahiri, Shibamouli
    Biswas, Arindam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE LINGUISTICS, 2019, 26 (04) : 287 - 305
  • [8] Problems in the linguistic analysis of literary texts
    Hundsnurscher, F
    [J]. MUTUAL EXCHANGES: SHEFFIELD-MUNSTER COLLOQUIUM I, 1999, : 38 - 50
  • [9] The Analysis of literary texts: a complete methodology
    Bellos, David
    [J]. FRENCH STUDIES, 2016, 70 (02) : 305 - 305
  • [10] Textuality assumptions and the analysis of literary texts
    Winko, Simone
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERMANISTISCHE LINGUISTIK, 2008, 36 (03): : 427 - 443