Strain gauges debonding fault detection for structural health monitoring

被引:31
|
作者
dos Reis, Joao [1 ]
Costa, Carlos Oliveira [1 ]
da Costa, Jose Sa [2 ]
机构
[1] Sci Instrumentat Ctr, LNEC, Ave Brasil 101, P-1700066 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Ctr Intelligent Syst IDMEC, Inst Super Tecn, Ave Rovisco Pais 1, P-1049001 Lisbon, Portugal
来源
关键词
loop current step response (LCSR) method; self-diagnosis sensor; strain measurement; temperature measurement; thermal sensors; SENSOR VALIDATION; SELF-VALIDATION; DIAGNOSIS; IMPLEMENTATION; FUSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1002/stc.2264
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Physical redundancy is a common approach in applications with safety-critical systems. But that is not always possible in some structural health monitoring (SHM) applications whether for economic, spatial, or safety reasons. Many SHM sensor validating applications only rely on analytical redundancy. In such circumstances, sensor faults and structural damage need to be assuredly discriminated. A self-diagnosis strain sensor operating in a continuous online SHM scenario is considered. The sensor is based on a full electric resistance strain gauge Wheatstone bridge. The state of the art shows that such a sensor has not yet been developed. The loop current step response (LCSR) is a well-known method to detect strain gauge debonding. However, applying the LCSR method to a full strain gauge Wheatstone bridge has some limitations analyzed in this paper. Two new methods for detecting strain gauge debonding are proposed and evaluated. These methods are based on consistency checking of the strain gauges grids temperature measurementsemploying an array of (a) digital contact temperature sensors or (b) quasi-contact microelectromechanical system thermopile sensors. The experimental results reveal that both methods are suitable for application in an SHM self-diagnosis sensor scenario. However, the quasi-contact measuring method showed to be more sensitive to the strain gauge grid debonding fault though.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Linear Guide with Material Integrated Strain Gauges for Structural Health Monitoring
    Humstorff, Gerrit
    Winkelmann, Cord
    Lang, Walter
    [J]. STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING 2015: SYSTEM RELIABILITY FOR VERIFICATION AND IMPLEMENTATION, VOLS. 1 AND 2, 2015, : 994 - 998
  • [2] Validation of Strain Gauges for Structural Health Monitoring With Bayesian Belief Networks
    Liu, Zheng
    Mrad, Nezih
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (01) : 400 - 407
  • [3] Effective fault detection in structural health monitoring systems
    Chaabane, Marwa
    Mansouri, Majdi
    Abodayeh, Kamaleldin
    Ben Hamida, Ahmed
    Nounou, Hazem
    Nounou, Mohamed
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [4] Fault detection filter applied to structural health monitoring
    Liberatore, S
    Speyer, JL
    Hsu, AC
    [J]. 42ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 1944 - 1949
  • [5] Application of a fault detection filter to structural health monitoring
    Liberatore, Sauro
    Speyer, Jason L.
    Hsu, Andy Chunliang
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2006, 42 (07) : 1199 - 1209
  • [6] Structural health monitoring using piezoceramic transducers as strain gauges and acoustic emission sensors simultaneously
    Huo, Linsheng
    Li, Xu
    Chen, Dongdong
    Li, Hongnan
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND CONCRETE, 2017, 20 (05): : 595 - 603
  • [7] Structural health monitoring of GFRP laminates using graphene-based smart strain gauges
    Anas, Muhammad
    Nasir, Muhammad Ali
    Asfar, Zeeshan
    Nauman, Saad
    Akalin, Mehmet
    Ahmad, Faiz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 40 (08)
  • [8] Structural health monitoring of GFRP laminates using graphene-based smart strain gauges
    Muhammad Anas
    Muhammad Ali Nasir
    Zeeshan Asfar
    Saad Nauman
    Mehmet Akalin
    Faiz Ahmad
    [J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 2018, 40
  • [9] A sensor fault detection strategy for structural health monitoring systems
    Chang, Chia-Ming
    Chou, Jau-Yu
    Tan, Ping
    Wang, Lei
    [J]. SMART STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 20 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [10] Bearing Fault Evaluation for Structural Health Monitoring, Fault Detection, Failure Prevention and Prognosis
    Saxena, Madhavendra
    Bannett, Olvin Oliver
    Sharma, Vivek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIBRATION PROBLEMS 2015, 2016, 144 : 208 - 214