Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings

被引:5
|
作者
Liang, Lihua [1 ]
Wen, Baohua [2 ]
Xu, Feng [2 ]
Yan, Jianwei [1 ]
Yan, Xiangqi [2 ]
Ramesh, S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Architecture, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Coll Architecture, Changsha 410082, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Malaya, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, Ctr Adv Mfg & Mat Proc, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[4] Univ Teknol Brunei, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, BE-1410 Gadong, Brunei
[5] Huanghe Jiaotong Univ, Zhengzhou 454950, Peoples R China
关键词
sustainable building; building sustainability assessment tool; development; evolution; correlation; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS; EFFICIENCY RATING SYSTEM; GREEN BUILDINGS; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; PROJECT-MANAGEMENT; BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; FUTURE; LEED; ENERGY;
D O I
10.3390/su132212909
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of materials science and construction technology, the concept of sustainable building (SB) and the Building Sustainability Assessment Tool (BSAT) have also evolved and developed. Understanding the development of BSAT and SB is of great significance to the sustainable development of the construction industry. This research used the bibliometric method to analyze the development and evolution in the relevant literature on SB and BSAT from 1990 to 2021, and the correlations and differences between them were investigated. We found that there are many common trends in the development of research efforts in SB and BSAT: (1) they focused solely on the environment, in the early days, and only later considered economic and social impacts; (2) the scales with which they are concerned continue to expand, from individual buildings to communities and even cities; (3) key areas, such as energy, materials, resources, indoor environmental quality, high-tech applications, adaptability, and concern for people are being given more attention by both SB and BSAT. On the other hand, the difference between them is that SB research focuses on more macro aspects, such as policy, culture, climate change, while BSAT research is more concerned with micro aspects, such as its system of tools. Furthermore, some current research gaps in the BSAT field are identified, clarifying its future research directions. By linking the evolution of the SB concept and the development of the BSAT research field, this review provides a new and valuable perspective for the sustainable assessment of the construction industry, which, itself, is conducive to the sustainable transformation of this industry, which could contribute greatly to the mitigation of global climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improving sustainability in communities: Linking the local scale to the concept of sustainable development
    Toniolo, Sara
    Pieretto, Chiara
    Camana, Daniela
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 101
  • [2] SUSTAINABLE BUILDINGS: EVOLUTION BEYOND BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODS
    Weerasinghe, U. G. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2022, 17 (04): : 199 - 217
  • [3] Linking sustainable diets to the concept of food system sustainability
    Tribaldos, Theresa
    Jacobi, Johann A.
    Rist, Stephan
    [J]. FUTURE OF FOOD-JOURNAL ON FOOD AGRICULTURE AND SOCIETY, 2018, 6 (01): : 71 - 84
  • [4] Linking impact assessment and sustainable development at the local level: The introduction of sustainability assessment systems
    Devuyst, D
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 8 (02) : 67 - 78
  • [5] Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools
    Atanda, Jubril Olakitan
    Ozturk, Ayse
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 22 (01) : 61 - 87
  • [6] Social criteria of sustainable development in relation to green building assessment tools
    Jubril Olakitan Atanda
    Ayşe Öztürk
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2020, 22 : 61 - 87
  • [7] Sustainability Assessment and Indicators: Tools in a Decision-Making Strategy for Sustainable Development
    Waas, Tom
    Huge, Jean
    Block, Thomas
    Wright, Tarah
    Benitez-Capistros, Francisco
    Verbruggen, Aviel
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (09) : 5512 - 5534
  • [8] Continuation and further development of sustainability criteria in the assessment system for sustainable house building
    Essig, Natalie
    Nisse, Juliane
    [J]. MAUERWERK, 2019, 23 (03) : 138 - 145
  • [9] Evolution of sustainability in global green building rating tools
    Wen, Baohua
    Musa, Nurmaya
    Onn, Chiu Chuen
    Ramesh, S.
    Liang, Lihua
    Wang, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 259
  • [10] MODERNISATION OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN POLISH TOWNS AND THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE BUILDING
    Chodkowska-Miszczuk, Justyna
    Szymanska, Daniela
    [J]. QUAESTIONES GEOGRAPHICAE, 2014, 33 (04) : 89 - 99