Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation

被引:13
|
作者
Nishio, Motohide [1 ]
Satoh, Masahiro [1 ]
机构
[1] NARO Inst Livestock & Grassland Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050901, Japan
关键词
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; GENOTYPE-IMPUTATION; BREEDING PROGRAMS; POPULATIONS; GROWTH; CATTLE; SELECTION; INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-015-0091-y
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: Genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is a statistical method used to predict breeding values using single nucleotide polymorphisms for selection in animal and plant breeding. Genetic effects are often modeled as additively acting marker allele effects. However, the actual mode of biological action can differ from this assumption. Many livestock traits exhibit genomic imprinting, which may substantially contribute to the total genetic variation of quantitative traits. Here, we present two statistical models of GBLUP including imprinting effects (GBLUP-I) on the basis of genotypic values (GBLUP-I1) and gametic values (GBLUP-I2). The performance of these models for the estimation of variance components and prediction of genetic values across a range of genetic variations was evaluated in simulations. Results: Estimates of total genetic variances and residual variances with GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were close to the true values and the regression coefficients of total genetic values on their estimates were close to 1. Accuracies of estimated total genetic values in both GBLUP-I methods increased with increasing degree of imprinting and broad-sense heritability. When the imprinting variances were equal to 1.4% to 6.0% of the phenotypic variances, the accuracies of estimated total genetic values with GBLUP-I1 exceeded those with GBLUP by 1.4% to 7.8%. In comparison with GBLUP-I1, the superiority of GBLUP-I2 over GBLUP depended strongly on degree of imprinting and difference in genetic values between paternal and maternal alleles. When paternal and maternal alleles were predicted (phasing accuracy was equal to 0.979), accuracies of the estimated total genetic values in GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 were 1.7% and 1.2% lower than when paternal and maternal alleles were known. Conclusions: This simulation study shows that GBLUP-I1 and GBLUP-I2 can accurately estimate total genetic variance and perform well for the prediction of total genetic values. GBLUP-I1 is preferred for genomic evaluation, while GBLUP-I2 is preferred when the imprinting effects are large, and the genetic effects differ substantially between sexes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method including imprinting effects for genomic evaluation
    Motohide Nishio
    Masahiro Satoh
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 47
  • [2] Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium
    Nishio, M.
    Satoh, M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2015, 132 (05) : 357 - 365
  • [3] polyGBLUP: a modified genomic best linear unbiased prediction improved the genomic prediction efficiency for autopolyploid species
    Song, Hailiang
    Zhang, Qin
    Hu, Hongxia
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 25 (02)
  • [4] Comparison of Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction and Bayesian Regularization Neural Networks for Genomic Selection
    Sinecen, Mahmut
    IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 79199 - 79210
  • [5] Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework
    Baller, Johnna L.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Kuehn, Larry A.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (06)
  • [6] Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
    Park, Mi Na
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kim, Sidong
    Park, Byoungho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Sung Soo
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 33 (10): : 1544 - 1557
  • [7] Including Dominance Effects in the Genomic BLUP Method for Genomic Evaluation
    Nishio, Motohide
    Satoh, Masahiro
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [8] Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle
    Lopez, Bryan Irvine
    Lee, Seung-Hwan
    Park, Jong-Eun
    Shin, Dong-Hyun
    Oh, Jae-Don
    de las Heras-Saldana, Sara
    van der Werf, Julius
    Chai, Han-Ha
    Park, Woncheoul
    Lim, Dajeong
    GENES, 2019, 10 (12)
  • [9] Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Xu, Shizhong
    Zhu, Dan
    Zhang, Qifa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2014, 111 (34) : 12456 - 12461
  • [10] Prediction of Complex Human Traits Using the Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor
    de los Campos, Gustavo
    Vazquez, Ana I.
    Fernando, Rohan
    Klimentidis, Yann C.
    Sorensen, Daniel
    PLOS GENETICS, 2013, 9 (07):