VERCASM-CPS: Vulnerability Analysis and Cyber Risk Assessment for Cyber-Physical Systems

被引:7
|
作者
Northern, Bradley [1 ]
Burks, Trey [1 ]
Hatcher, Marlana [1 ]
Rogers, Michael [1 ]
Ulybyshev, Denis [1 ]
机构
[1] Tennessee Technol Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Cookeville, TN 38505 USA
关键词
cyber-physical systems; industrial control systems; data privacy; moving target defense; cyber-risk score;
D O I
10.3390/info12100408
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Since Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) are widely used in critical infrastructures, it is essential to protect their assets from cyber attacks to increase the level of security, safety and trustworthiness, prevent failure developments, and minimize losses. It is necessary to analyze the CPS configuration in an automatic mode to detect the most vulnerable CPS components and reconfigure or replace them promptly. In this paper, we present a methodology to determine the most secure CPS configuration by using a public database of cyber vulnerabilities to identify the most secure CPS components. We also integrate the CPS cyber risk analysis with a Controlled Moving Target Defense, which either replaces the vulnerable CPS components or re-configures the CPS to harden it, while the vulnerable components are being replaced. Our solution helps to design a more secure CPS by updating the configuration of existing CPS to make them more resilient against cyber attacks. In this paper, we will compare cyber risk scores for different CPS configurations and show that the Windows(R) 10 build 20H2 operating system is more secure than Linux Ubuntu(R) 20.04, while Red Hat(R) Enterprise(R) Linux is the most secure in some system configurations.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cyber-Physical Vulnerability Assessment in Manufacturing Systems
    DeSmit, Zach
    Elhabashy, Ahmad E.
    Wells, Lee J.
    Camelio, Jaime A.
    44TH NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE, NAMRC 44, 2016, 5 : 1060 - 1074
  • [2] METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVE RISK ASSESSMENT OF CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS BASED ON VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS
    Alguliyev, Rasim
    Aliguliyev, Ramiz
    Sukhostat, Lyudmila
    KYBERNETIKA, 2024, 60 (06) : 779 - 796
  • [3] Vulnerability Assessment of Electrical Cyber-Physical Systems against Cyber Attacks
    Wang, Yinan
    Yan, Gangfeng
    Zheng, Ronghao
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2018, 8 (05):
  • [4] Electric power cyber-physical systems vulnerability assessment under cyber attack
    Qu, Zhengwei
    Sun, Wenting
    Dong, Jie
    Zhao, Jianjun
    Li, Yang
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 10
  • [5] Benchmarking Vulnerability Assessment Tools for Enhanced Cyber-Physical System (CPS) Resiliency
    McMahon, Emma
    Patton, Mark
    Samtani, Sagar
    Chen, Hsinchun
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY INFORMATICS (ISI), 2018, : 100 - 105
  • [6] HVA_CPS proposal: a process for hazardous vulnerability analysis in distributed cyber-physical systems
    Jamieson A.
    Few C.
    Awuson-David K.
    Al-Hadhrami T.
    PeerJ Computer Science, 2023, 9
  • [7] Use of Topological Vulnerability Analysis for Cyber-physical Systems
    Fernandes, Ronald
    Benjamin, Perakath
    Li, Biyan
    Stephenson, Andrew
    Patel, Mayank
    Hwang, Jong
    NAECON 2018 - IEEE NATIONAL AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONICS CONFERENCE, 2018, : 78 - 81
  • [8] HVA_CPS proposal: a process for hazardous vulnerability analysis in distributed cyber-physical systems
    Jamieson, Alan
    Few, Chris
    Awuson-David, Kenny
    Al-Hadhrami, Tawfik
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2023, 9
  • [9] Analysis of Security Threats and Vulnerability for Cyber-physical Systems
    Gao, Yang
    Peng, Yong
    Xie, Feng
    Zhao, Wei
    Wang, Dejin
    Han, Xuefeng
    Lug, Tianbo
    Lie, Zhao
    2013 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK TECHNOLOGY (ICCSNT), 2013, : 50 - 55
  • [10] Vulnerability assessment of cyber-physical power system considering virtual cyber-physical connections
    Chen K.
    Wen F.
    Zhao J.
    Li L.
    Yang Y.
    Tan Y.
    Dianli Zidonghua Shebei/Electric Power Automation Equipment, 2017, 37 (12): : 67 - 72and79