Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft in left main coronary artery disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials

被引:9
|
作者
Bertaina, Maurizio [1 ]
De Filippo, Ovidio [1 ]
Iannaccone, Mario [1 ]
Colombo, Antonio [2 ]
Stone, Gregg [3 ]
Serruys, Patrick [4 ]
Mancone, Massimo [5 ]
Omede, Pierluigi [1 ]
Conrotto, Federico [1 ]
Pennone, Mauro [1 ]
Kimura, Takeshi [6 ]
Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi [2 ]
Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi [7 ,8 ]
Sheiban, Imad [9 ]
Templin, Christian [10 ]
Benedetto, Umberto [11 ]
Cavalcante, Rafael [4 ]
D'Amico, Maurizio [1 ]
Gaudino, Mario [11 ,12 ]
Moretti, Claudio [1 ]
Gaita, Fiorenzo [1 ]
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Molinette Mauriziano Hosp, Citta Salute & Sci, Div Cardiol, Turin, Italy
[2] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Cardiothorac Vasc Dept, Intervent Cardiol, Milan, Italy
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Presbyterian Hosp, Cardiovasc Res & Educ, New York, NY USA
[4] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Intervent Cardiol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Cardiovasc Resp Nephrol Anesthesiol & Geriat, Rome, Italy
[6] Kyoto Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Kyoto, Japan
[7] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Medicosurg Sci & Biotechnol, Latina, Italy
[8] IRCCS Neuromed, Dept AngioCardioNeurol, Pozzilli, Italy
[9] Pederzoli Hosp, Cardiol Dept, Verona, Italy
[10] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Cardiol, Univ Heart Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[11] Univ Bristol, Sch Clin Sci, Bristol Heart Inst, Bristol, Avon, England
[12] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
coronary artery bypass graft; coronary artery disease; left main; percutaneous coronary intervention; surgery; left main percutaneous; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; STENOSIS; SURGERY; CARDIOLOGY; OUTCOMES; SOCIETY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.2459/JCM.0000000000000703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundTreatment of patients with ULMCA (unprotected left main coronary artery disease) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), without conclusive results.MethodsAll randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with multivariate analysis comparing PCI and CABG for ULMCA were included. Major cardiovascular events (MACEs, composite of all-cause death, MI, definite or probable ST, target vessel revascularization and stroke) were the primary end points, whereas its single components were the secondary ones, along with stent thrombosis, graft occlusion and in-hospital death and stroke. Subgroup analyses were performed according to Syntax score.ResultsSix RCTs (4717 patients) and 20 observational studies with multivariate adjustment (14597 patients) were included. After 5 (3-5.5) years, MACE rate was higher for PCI [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.14], without difference in death, whereas more relevant risk of MI was because of observational studies. Coronary stenting increased risk of revascularization (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.34-1.72). At meta-regression, performance of PCI was improved by use of intra-coronary imaging and worsened by first generation stents, whereas two arterial grafts increased benefit of CABG. For patients with Syntax score less than 22, MACE rates did not differ, whereas for higher values, CABG reduced MACE because of lower risk of revascularization. Incidence of graft occlusion was 3.24% (2.25-4.23), whereas 2.13% (1.28-2.98: all CI 95%) of patients experienced stent thrombosis.ConclusionSurgical revascularization reduces risk of revascularization for ULMCA patients, especially for those with Syntax score greater than 22, with a higher risk of in-hospital death. Intra-coronary imaging and use of arterial grafts improved performance of revascularization strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 563
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Ueyama, Hiroki
    Rao, Sunil V.
    Cohen, Mauricio G.
    Tamis-Holland, Jacqueline E.
    Thompson, Craig
    Takagi, Hisato
    Bangalore, Sripal
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 227 : 9 - 10
  • [2] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis
    Gallo, Michele
    Blitzer, David
    Laforgia, Pietro L.
    Doulamis, Ilias P.
    Perrin, Nils
    Bortolussi, Giacomo
    Guariento, Alvise
    Putzu, Alessandro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (01): : 94 - +
  • [3] Five-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized trials and adjusted observational studies
    Gargiulo, Giuseppe
    Tamburino, Corrado
    Capodanno, Davide
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 195 : 79 - 81
  • [4] Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A Meta-Analysis and Regression of Randomized Trials
    Mahmoud, Ahmed N.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Mentias, Amgad
    Saad, Marwan
    Ibrahim, Walid
    Mojadidi, Mohammad K.
    Nairooz, Ramez
    Eshtehardi, Parham
    Anderson, R. David
    Samady, Habib
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (04) : 541 - 552
  • [5] Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sharma, Sharan P.
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Khatra, Jaspreet
    Rosenfeld, Alan
    Lee, Juyong
    [J]. CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 35 (03)
  • [6] PCI or CABG in left main coronary artery disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials
    De Filippo, O.
    Bertaina, M.
    Iannaccone, M.
    Colombo, A.
    Stone, G.
    Serruys, P.
    Mancone, M.
    Biondi-Zoccai, G.
    Kimura, T.
    Kawamoto, H.
    Sheiban, I.
    Templin, C.
    Benedetto, U.
    Moretti, C.
    D'Ascenzo, F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 325 - 325
  • [7] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis - Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Khalid, Muhammad Faisal
    Murtaza, Ghulam
    Ayub, Muhammad T.
    Kohli, Varun
    Paul, Timir K.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (04) : S20 - S21
  • [8] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Data
    Capodanno, Davide
    Stone, Gregg W.
    Morice, Marie C.
    Bass, Theodore A.
    Tamburino, Corrado
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (14) : 1426 - 1432
  • [9] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hennessy, C.
    Henry, J. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 : 249 - 249
  • [10] Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Putzu, Alessandro
    Gallo, Michele
    Martino, Enrico Antonio
    Ferrari, Enrico
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Moccetti, Tiziano
    Cassina, Tiziano
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 241 : 142 - 148