A suitability analysis of transient one-dimensional two-fluid numerical models for simulating two-phase gas-liquid flows based on benchmark problems

被引:4
|
作者
Sondermann, Carina Nogueira [1 ]
Viggiano, Raphael [1 ]
de Freitas Rachid, Felipe Bastos [2 ]
Bodstein, Gustavo C. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Ctr Tecnol, Mech Engn Dept COPPE, Bloco G,Sala 204, BR-21941914 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Mech Engn Grad Program TEM PGMEC, Rua Passo Patria 156, BR-24210240 Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Two-phase flow; Two-fluid model; Transient simulation; Numerical methods; Benchmark problems; FLUX-CORRECTED TRANSPORT; SCHEMES; RESOLUTION; PRESSURE; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105070
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Gas-liquid two-phase flows in pipes are present in a variety of engineering applications. These applications require transient one-dimensional mathematical models coupled with robust numerical methods to simulate the flow behavior in time and space. As there exist several possible combinations of models and numerical methods, questions arise as to the suitability of these numerical models to best accommodate the problem features. Aiming to partially answer this question, we present in this work numerical simulations of two well-known gas-liquid benchmarks, the water faucet, and the shock tube problems, carried out with two two-fluid models - 4E1P (four equations and one pressure) and 5E2P (five equations and two pressures) - in association with three numerical methods - FCT (Flux-Corrected Transport method), FORCE (First-Order Centered Scheme) and ModFORCE. The numerical methods used herein are written in a general form and do not require the solution of the associated Riemann problem. The obtained results are sought to serve as a reference to choose the best approaches, among the ones studied, to tackle some transient one-dimensional two-phase flow problems, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each model and method combination regarding hyperbolicity, diffusive and dispersive effects. Overall, the combination of the 5E2P model with the ModFORCE numerical method provides the most accurate results compared to the analytical solutions available.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条