Managing daily intensive care activities: An observational study concerning ad hoc decision making of charge nurses and intensivists

被引:34
|
作者
Lundgren-Laine, Helja [1 ,2 ]
Kontio, Elina [1 ,3 ]
Perttila, Juha [4 ]
Korvenranta, Heikki [2 ]
Forsstrom, Jari [5 ]
Salantera, Sanna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Nursing Sci, FI-20014 Turku, Finland
[2] Turku Univ Hosp, Bur Adm, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[3] Turku Univ Appl Sci, Fac Telecommun & E Business, FI-20520 Turku, Finland
[4] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, FI-20521 Turku, Finland
[5] Finnish Med Assoc, FI-00501 Helsinki, Finland
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2011年 / 15卷 / 04期
关键词
CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; CLINICAL INFORMATION; UNIT; ICU; SYSTEM; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMMUNICATION; PERFORMANCE; GUIDELINES; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/cc10341
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Management of daily activities in ICUs is challenging. ICU shift leaders, charge nurses and intensivists have to make several immediate ad hoc decisions to enable the fluent flow of ICU activities. Even though the management of ICU activities is quite well delineated by international consensus guidelines, we know only a little about the content of the real clinical decision making of ICU shift leaders. Methods: We conducted an observational study with the think-aloud technique to describe the ad hoc decision making of ICU shift leaders. The study was performed in two university-affiliated hospital ICUs. Twelve charge nurses and eight intensivists were recruited. Observations were recorded and transcribed for qualitative content analysis using the protocol analysis method. The software program NVivo 7 was used to manage the data. The interrater agreement was assessed with percentages and by Cohen's k. Results: We identified 463 ad hoc decisions made by the charge nurses and 444 made by the intensivists. During our data collection time, this breaks down to over 230 immediately made decisions per day (24 hours). We divided the ad hoc decision making of ICU shift leaders into two types: process-focused and situation-focused. Process-focused decision making included more permanent information, such as human resources, know-how and material resources, whereas situation-focused decision making included decisions about single events, such as patient admission. We named eight different categories for ICU ad hoc decision making: (1) adverse events, (2) diagnostics, (3) human resources and know-how, (4) material resources, (5) patient admission, (6) patient discharge, (7) patient information and vital signs and (8) special treatments. Conclusions: ICU shift leaders make a great number of complex ad hoc decisions throughout the day. Often this decision making involves both intensivists and charge nurses. It forms a bundle that requires versatile, immediate information for a successful outcome. In the future, we need to investigate which information is crucial for ad hoc decision making. These challenges should also be emphasised when information technology programs for ICU care management are developed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Managing daily intensive care activities: An observational study concerning ad hoc decision making of charge nurses and intensivists
    Heljä Lundgrén-Laine
    Elina Kontio
    Juha Perttilä
    Heikki Korvenranta
    Jari Forsström
    Sanna Salanterä
    Critical Care, 15
  • [2] IS THERE A NEED FOR "A CARE BUNDLE" TO SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION-MAKING? CHARGE NURSES AND INTENSIVISTS MANAGING DAILY ACTIVITIES OF ICUS
    Lundgren-Laine, H.
    Kontio, E.
    Salantera, S.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 : S421 - S421
  • [3] Nurse decision-making when managing noradrenaline in the intensive care unit: A naturalistic observational study
    Hunter, Stephanie
    Considine, Julie
    Manias, Elizabeth
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2023, 77
  • [4] Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study with Physicians, Nurses and Parents
    Kahveci, Rabia
    Ayhan, Duygu
    Doner, Pinar
    Cihan, Fatma Goksin
    Koc, Esra Meltem
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 81 (12): : 1287 - 1292
  • [5] Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study with Physicians, Nurses and Parents
    Rabia Kahveci
    Duygu Ayhan
    Pınar Döner
    Fatma Gökşin Cihan
    Esra Meltem Koç
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2014, 81 : 1287 - 1292
  • [6] The Eldicus prospective, observational study of triage decision making in European intensive care units. Part II: Intensive care benefit for the elderly
    Sprung, Charles L.
    Artigas, Antonio
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Pezzi, Angelo
    Wiis, Joergen
    Pirracchio, Romain
    Baras, Mario
    Edbrooke, David L.
    Pesenti, Antonio
    Bakker, Jan
    Hargreaves, Chris
    Gurman, Gabriel
    Cohen, Simon L.
    Lippert, Anne
    Payen, Didier
    Corbella, Davide
    Iapichino, Gaetano
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [7] Nurses' perspectives on shared decision-making in the daily care of hospitalized patients with dementia: An exploratory qualitative study
    Plantinga, Annette
    Roodbol, Petrie F.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Finnema, Evelyn J.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (11) : 4654 - 4664
  • [8] Decision-making processes in nursing and activities at the end of life in intensive care - An international comparative study
    Kohlen, Helen
    McCarthy, Joan
    Buosso, Regina Szylit
    Gallagher, Ann
    Andrews, Tom
    PFLEGE, 2015, 28 (06): : 329 - 338
  • [9] Decision-making regarding withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and the role of intensivists in the intensive care unit: a single-center study
    Lee, Seo In
    Hong, Kyung Sook
    Park, Jin
    Lee, Young-Joo
    ACUTE AND CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 35 (03) : 179 - 188
  • [10] Decision-making regarding antibiotic therapy duration: An observational study of multidisciplinary meetings in the intensive care unit
    Janssen, Robin M. E.
    Oerlemans, Anke J. M.
    van der Hoeven, Johannes G.
    Oostdijk, Evelien A. N.
    Derde, Lennie P. G.
    ten Oever, Jaap
    Wertheim, Heiman F. L.
    Hulscher, Marlies E. J. L.
    Schouten, Jeroen A.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 78