Dormant Bots in Social Media: Twitter and the 2018 US Senate Election

被引:3
|
作者
Takacs, Richard [1 ]
McCulloh, Ian [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Appl Phys Lab, Laurel, MD 20723 USA
[2] Accenture, Washington, DC USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS ANALYSIS AND MINING (ASONAM 2019) | 2019年
关键词
Twitter; bots; social media; elections; political;
D O I
10.1145/3341161.3343852
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bots are often identified on social media due to their behavior. How easily are they identified, however, when they are dormant and exhibit no measurable behavior at all, except for their silence? We identified "dormant bot networks" positioned to influence social media discourse surrounding the 2018 U.S. senate election. A dormant bot is a social media persona that does not post content yet has large follower and friend relationships with other users. These relationships may be used to manipulate online narratives and elevate or suppress certain discussions in the social media feed of users. Using a simple structure-based approach, we identify a large number of dormant bots created in 2017 that begin following the social media accounts of numerous US government politicians running for re-election in 2018. Findings from this research were used by the U.S. Government to suspend dormant bots prior to the elections to prevent any malign influence campaign. Application of this approach by social media providers may provide a novel method to reduce the risk of content manipulation for online platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:796 / 800
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Twitter social bots: The 2019 Spanish general election data
    Pastor-Galindo, Javier
    Zago, Mattia
    Nespoli, Pantaleone
    Lopez Bernal, Sergio
    Celdran, Alberto Huertas
    Gil Perez, Manuel
    Ruiperez-Valiente, Jose A.
    Martinez Perez, Gregorio
    Gomez Marmol, Felix
    DATA IN BRIEF, 2020, 32
  • [2] Profiling users and bots in Twitter through social media analysis
    -Galindo, Javier Pastor
    Marmol, Felix Gomez
    Perez, Gregorio Martinez
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 613 : 161 - 183
  • [3] Perils and Challenges of Social Media and Election Manipulation Analysis: The 2018 US Midterms
    Deb, Ashok
    Luceri, Luca
    Badawy, Adam
    Ferrara, Emilio
    COMPANION OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB CONFERENCE (WWW 2019 ), 2019, : 237 - 247
  • [4] Spotting Political Social Bots in Twitter: A Use Case of the 2019 Spanish General Election
    Pastor-Galindo, Javier
    Zago, Mattia
    Nespoli, Pantaleone
    Lopez Bernal, Sergio
    Huertas Celdran, Alberto
    Gil Perez, Manuel
    Ruiperez-Valiente, Jose A.
    Martinez Perez, Gregorio
    Gomez Marmol, Felix
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 17 (04): : 2156 - 2170
  • [5] Congressional social media communications: evaluating Senate Twitter usage
    Straus, Jacob R.
    Williams, Raymond T.
    Shogan, Colleen J.
    Glassman, Matthew E.
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2016, 40 (05) : 643 - 659
  • [6] Phishing Through Social Bots on Twitter
    Shafahi, Mohammad
    Kempers, Leon
    Afsarmanesh, Hamideh
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2016, : 3703 - 3712
  • [7] Evidence of complex contagion of information in social media: An experiment using Twitter bots
    Monsted, Bjarke
    Sapiezynski, Piotr
    Ferrara, Emilio
    Lehmann, Sune
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [8] Can Social Media Engagement Predict Election Results? Bandwagon Effects of Tweets About US Senate Candidates
    Wang, Jinping
    Sundar, S. Shyam
    Ram, Nilam
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2024, 10 (04):
  • [9] Strategic Voting in a US Senate Election
    McKee, Seth C.
    Hood, M. V., III
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2013, 35 (04) : 729 - 751