Future restoration should enhance ecological complexity and emergent properties at multiple scales

被引:44
|
作者
Bullock, James M. [1 ]
Fuentes-Montemayor, Elisa [2 ]
McCarthy, Ben [3 ]
Park, Kirsty [4 ]
Hails, Rosie S. [3 ]
Woodcock, Ben A. [1 ]
Watts, Kevin [4 ,5 ]
Corstanje, Ron [6 ]
Harris, Jim [6 ]
机构
[1] UK Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, Wallingford, Oxon, England
[2] Scotlands Rural Coll, Craibstone Estate, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Natl Trust, Kemble Dr, Swindon, Wilts, England
[4] Univ Stirling, Biol & Environm Sci, Stirling, Scotland
[5] Alice Holt Lodge, Forest Res, Farnham, Surrey, England
[6] Cranfield Univ, Sch Water Energy & Environm, Cranfield, Beds, England
关键词
connectivity; conservation; ecosystem functions; ecosystem services; landscape; resilience; UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; NATURE CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY LOSS; TIME; COMMUNITIES; POPULATIONS; RESILIENCE; REVEALS; NETWORK; PEST;
D O I
10.1111/ecog.05780
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecological restoration has a paradigm of re-establishing 'indigenous reference' communities. One resulting concern is that focussing on target communities may not necessarily create systems which function at a high level or are resilient in the face of ongoing global change. Ecological complexity - defined here, based on theory, as the number of components in a system and the number of connections among them - provides a complementary aim, which can be measured directly and has several advantages. Ecological complexity encompasses key ecosystem variables including structural heterogeneity, trophic interactions and functional diversity. Ecological complexity can also be assessed at the landscape scale, with metrics including beta diversity, heterogeneity among habitat patches and connectivity. Thus, complexity applies, and can be measured, at multiple scales. Importantly, complexity is linked to system emergent properties, e.g. ecosystem functions and resilience, and there is evidence that both are enhanced by complexity. We suggest that restoration ecology should consider a new paradigm to restore complexity at multiple scales, in particular of individual ecosystems and across landscapes. A complexity approach can make use of certain current restoration methods but also encompass newer concepts such as rewilding. Indeed, a complexity goal might in many cases best be achieved by interventionist restoration methods. Incorporating complexity into restoration policies could be quite straightforward. Related aims such as enhancing ecosystem services and ecological resilience are to the fore in initiatives such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Implementation in policy and practice will need the development of complexity metrics that can be applied at both local and regional scales. Ultimately, the adoption of an ecological complexity paradigm will be based on an acceptance that the ongoing and unprecedented global environmental change requires new ways of doing restoration that is fit for the future.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Predicting ecosystem emergent properties at multiple scales
    Gilbert, Jack A.
    Henry, Chris
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 7 (01): : 20 - 22
  • [2] The need for future wetland bird studies: scales of habitat use as input for ecological restoration and spatial water management
    Platteeuw, Maarten
    Foppen, Ruud P. B.
    van Eerden, Mennobart R.
    [J]. ARDEA, 2010, 98 (03) : 403 - 416
  • [3] Bio-inspired barb structure designed on the surface of carbon fibers to enhance the interfacial properties of composites in multiple scales
    Qiu, Baowei
    Ni, Long
    Zhang, Xueqin
    Chen, Yang
    Zhou, Shengtai
    Heng, Zhengguang
    Liang, Mei
    Zou, Huawei
    [J]. MATERIALS CHEMISTRY FRONTIERS, 2021, 5 (15) : 5769 - 5779
  • [4] Relationships between stream ecosystem properties and landscape composition at multiple spatial scales along a heavily polluted stream in China: Implications for restoration
    Wen, Teng
    Sheng, Sheng
    An, Shuqing
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 97 : 493 - 502