Operationalizing respectful maternity care at the healthcare provider level: a systematic scoping review

被引:23
|
作者
Jolivet, R. Rima [1 ]
Gausman, Jewel [1 ]
Kapoor, Neena [1 ]
Langer, Ana [1 ]
Sharma, Jigyasa [1 ]
Semrau, Katherine E. A. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth & Populat, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, BetterBirth Program, Ariadne Labs, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Global Hlth Equ, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, 401 Pk Dr,3rd Floor West, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
Maternal health; Quality of care; Respectful maternity care; Professional guidelines; Obstetrics & gynecology; Nursing; Midwifery; Measurement; HUMAN-RIGHTS; CHILDBIRTH; QUALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; FACILITIES; DISRESPECT; SERVICES; ABUSE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-021-01241-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Ensuring the right to respectful care for maternal and newborn health, a critical dimension of quality and acceptability, requires meeting standards for Respectful Maternity Care (RMC). Absence of mistreatment does not constitute RMC. Evidence generation to inform definitional standards for RMC is in an early stage. The aim of this systematic review is clear provider-level operationalization of key RMC principles, to facilitate their consistent implementation. Methods Two rights-based frameworks define the underlying principles of RMC. A qualitative synthesis of both frameworks resulted in seven fundamental rights during childbirth that form the foundation of RMC. To codify operational definitions for these key elements of RMC at the healthcare provider level, we systematically reviewed peer-reviewed literature, grey literature, white papers, and seminal documents on RMC. We focused on literature describing RMC in the affirmative rather than mistreatment experienced by women during childbirth, and operationalized RMC by describing objective provider-level behaviors. Results Through a systematic review, 514 records (peer-reviewed articles, reports, and guidelines) were assessed to identify operational definitions of RMC grounded in those rights. After screening and review, 54 records were included in the qualitative synthesis and mapped to the seven RMC rights. The majority of articles provided guidance on operationalization of rights to freedom from harm and ill treatment; dignity and respect; information and informed consent; privacy and confidentiality; and timely healthcare. Only a quarter of articles mentioned concrete or affirmative actions to operationalize the right to non-discrimination, equality and equitable care; less than 15%, the right to liberty and freedom from coercion. Provider behaviors mentioned in the literature aligned overall with seven RMC principles; yet the smaller number of available research studies that included operationalized definitions for some key elements of RMC illustrates the nascent stage of evidence-generation in this area. Conclusions Lack of systematic codification, grounded in empirical evidence, of operational definitions for RMC at the provider level has limited the study, design, implementation, and comparative assessment of respectful care. This qualitative systematic review provides a foundation for maternity healthcare professional policy, training, programming, research, and program evaluation aimed at studying and improving RMC at the provider level. Plain Language Summary Respectful care for mothers and newborns is a right and important part of ensuring that their care is high quality and acceptable to them. Just because there is no mistreatment does not mean that Respectful Maternity Care (RMC) was given. Without a clear framework for provider behaviors that reflect RMC principles, it is hard to ensure every woman and newborn gets respectful care in practice. We compared and combined two frameworks summarizing maternal and newborn rights and came out with seven categories. Then we searched for articles that mentioned provider behaviors reflecting RMC. We found 514 articles and ended up with 54 after careful review, from which we pulled the observable behaviors for providers in each category. Almost all papers mentioned actions to protect women and newborns from harm and mistreatment, to treat them with dignity and respect, and to give information and respect choices. About half of papers mentioned actions to protect privacy and to make sure every mother and newborn gets care when needed. Only 25% of papers mentioned actions to make sure all women and newborns receive equal care, and only 15% included actions to make sure women and newborns are physically free to leave facilities at will, and get care whether or not they can pay. This framework defining RMC behaviors for providers is based on data from many studies and can be useful to look at whether maternal newborn care in facilities meets these standards and to inform training and more research to improve RMC.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Operationalizing respectful maternity care at the healthcare provider level: a systematic scoping review
    R. Rima Jolivet
    Jewel Gausman
    Neena Kapoor
    Ana Langer
    Jigyasa Sharma
    Katherine E. A. Semrau
    [J]. Reproductive Health, 18
  • [2] Respectful Maternity Care: A Systematic Review
    Cantor, Amy G.
    Jungbauer, Rebecca M.
    Skelly, Andrea C.
    Hart, Erica L.
    Jorda, Katherine
    Davis-O'Reilly, Cynthia
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Tilden, Ellen L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2024, 177 (01) : 50 - 64
  • [3] Approaches and geographical locations of respectful maternity care research: A scoping review
    Shuman, Hannah L.
    Grupp, Annika M.
    Robb, Lauren A.
    Akers, Katherine G.
    Bedi, Gurbani
    Shah, Miloni A.
    Janis, Andrea
    Caldart, Caroline G.
    Gupta, Urvashi
    Vaghasia, Janki K.
    Panneerselvam, Aishwarya
    Kazeem, Aisha O.
    Amutah-Onukagha, Ndidiamaka N.
    Levine, Diane L.
    Alwy Al-beity, Fadhlun
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [4] Quality of measures on respectful and disrespectful maternity care: A systematic review
    Dhakal, Prativa
    Gamble, Jenny
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Newnham, Elizabeth
    [J]. NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 23 (01) : 29 - 39
  • [5] Evidence on respectful maternity care for adolescents: a systematic review protocol
    Habib, Helen H.
    Mwaisaka, Jefferson
    Torpey, Kwasi
    Maya, Ernest Tei
    Ankomah, Augustine
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)
  • [6] Evidence on respectful maternity care for adolescents: a systematic review protocol
    Helen H. Habib
    Jefferson Mwaisaka
    Kwasi Torpey
    Ernest Tei Maya
    Augustine Ankomah
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [7] Respectful Maternity Care: A Narrative Review
    Parmita, Pragyna
    Acharya, Neema
    Joshi, Ketav
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 18 (03) : QE1 - QE7
  • [8] Respectful maternity care: A national landscape review
    Ansari, Humaira
    Yeravdekar, Rajiv
    [J]. NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 2019, 32 (05): : 290 - 293
  • [9] Educational interventions to promote respectful maternity care: A mixed-methods systematic review
    Dhakal, Prativa
    Creedy, Debra K.
    Gamble, Jenny
    Newnham, Elizabeth
    McInnes, Rhona
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION IN PRACTICE, 2022, 60
  • [10] Respectful maternity care during childbirth in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ansari, H.
    Yeravdekar, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2020, 66 (03) : 133 - 140