Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed appendicitis

被引:82
|
作者
Moberg, AC [1 ]
Berndsen, F [1 ]
Palmquist, I [1 ]
Petersson, U [1 ]
Resch, T [1 ]
Montgomery, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.4842
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopy is safe for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. This study compared recovery after laparoscopic (LA) and open appendicectomy (OA) for confirmed appendicitis, carried out by experienced surgeons in an educational setting. Methods: One hundred and sixty-three patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis suitable for LA were randomized prospectively to either LA or OA in a blinded fashion. The primary endpoint was time to full recovery. Secondary endpoints were operating time, complications, hospital stay and functional status. Results: There was no significant difference between LA and OA in time to full recovery (9 and 11 days respectively; P = 0.225). Operating time was 55 min in the LA group and 60 min in the OA group (P = 0.416). The complication rate was 8.6 and 11.0 per cent respectively (P = 0.696), and median hospital stay was 2 days in both groups (P = 0.192). Functional status was significantly better in the LA group 7-10 days after operation (P = 0.045). Conclusion: There was no difference in time to full recovery after LA and OA in patients with laparoscopically confirmed appendicitis. A trend towards better physical activity was noted after the laparoscopic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appcndicectomy for confirmed appendicitis
    Novik, B
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (06) : 784 - 784
  • [2] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy
    Pedersen, AG
    Petersen, OB
    Wara, P
    Ronning, H
    Qvist, N
    Laurberg, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (02) : 200 - 205
  • [3] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children
    Roy, A
    Parker, SJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) : 1264 - 1265
  • [4] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children
    Lintula, H
    Kokki, H
    Vanamo, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (04) : 510 - 514
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial
    Ahmed Talha
    Hany El-Haddad
    Abd-Elhamid Ghazal
    Gihan Shehata
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2020, 34 : 907 - 914
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in adults: randomized clinical trial
    Talha, Ahmed
    El-Haddad, Hany
    Ghazal, Abd-Elhamid
    Shehata, Gihan
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (02): : 907 - 914
  • [7] Single-blind randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in children - Reply
    Kokki, H
    Lintula, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (09) : 1265 - 1265
  • [8] A prospective trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy
    Hassen, AHS
    Cade, RJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (03): : 178 - 180
  • [9] Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic appendicectomy
    Kouhia, S. T.
    Heiskanen, J. T.
    Huttunen, R.
    Ahtola, H. I.
    Kiviniemi, V. V.
    Hakala, T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (09) : 1395 - 1400
  • [10] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open Fundoplication
    Nilsson, G
    Larsson, S
    Johnsson, F
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 37 (04) : 385 - 391