Avian Use of Agricultural Areas as Migration Stopover Sites: A Review of Crop Management Practices and Ecological Correlates

被引:26
|
作者
Blount, J. David [1 ]
Horns, Joshua J. [1 ,2 ]
Kittelberger, Kyle D. [1 ]
Neate-Clegg, Montague H. C. [1 ]
Sekercioglu, Cagan Hakki [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Biol Sci, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah Hlth, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Koc Univ, Coll Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
关键词
crop science; land use; landscape ecology; habitat; diet; nearctic; palearctic; conservation ecology; SPRING-STAGING ECOLOGY; RICE FIELDS; HABITAT USE; NORTHERN PINTAILS; SANDHILL CRANES; FOREST BIRDS; CONSERVATION; POPULATION; ABUNDANCE; GEESE;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2021.650641
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
An estimated 17% of migratory bird species are threatened or near threatened with extinction. This represents an enormous potential loss of biodiversity and cost to human societies due to the economic benefits that birds provide through ecosystem services and ecotourism. Conservation of migratory bird species presents many unique challenges, as these birds rely on multiple geographically distinct habitats, including breeding grounds, non-breeding grounds, and stopover sites during migration. In particular, stopover habitats are seldom studied relative to breeding and non-breeding habitats, despite their importance as refueling stations for migratory birds. In this study, we summarize the current research on the use of temporary primary crops by birds during migration and we assess the species characteristics and agricultural practices most often associated with the use of cropland as stopover habitat. First, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to document the effects various farming practices and crop types have on the abundance and diversity of migratory birds using agricultural areas for stopovers. Second, we analyzed the ecological correlates of bird species in the Northern Hemisphere that predict which species may use these areas while migrating. We ran a GLMM to test whether primary diet, diet breadth, primary habitat, habitat breadth, or realm predicted stopover use of agricultural areas. Our review suggests that particular crop types (principally rice, corn, and sunflower), as well as farming practices that result in higher non-cultivated plant diversity, encourage the use of agricultural areas by migrating birds. We found that cropland is used as stopover habitat by bird species that can utilize a large breadth of habitats, as well as species with preferences for habitat similar in structure to agricultural areas.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] A review of Best Management Practices for potato crop using Precision Agricultural Technologies
    Ahmad, Uzair
    Sharma, Lakesh
    SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 4
  • [2] Distribution and abundance of Aphanomyces euteiches in agricultural soils: effect of land use type, soil properties, and crop management practices
    Karppinen, Erin M.
    Payment, Josephine
    Chatterton, Syama
    Bainard, Jillian D.
    Hubbard, Michelle
    Gan, Yantai
    Bainard, Luke D.
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2020, 150
  • [3] Integrated soil fertility management practices for improved crop production in smallholder farming systems of semi-arid areas: A synthetic review
    Kugedera, Andrew Tapiwa
    Badza, Taruvinga
    Odindo, Alfred Oduor
    COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [4] Impact of Farm Management Practices and Agricultural Land Use on Soil Organic Carbon Storage Potential in the Savannah Ecological Zone of Northern Ghana
    Boakye-Danquah, John
    Antwi, Effah Kwabena
    Saito, Osamu
    Abekoe, Mark Kofi
    Takeuchi, Kazuhiko
    JOURNAL OF DISASTER RESEARCH, 2014, 9 (04) : 484 - 500
  • [5] Dealing with weedy problems in agriculture: the role of three agricultural land use management practices in the forest-savanna ecological zone of Ghana
    Awanyo, Louis
    AREA, 2008, 40 (04) : 446 - 458
  • [6] Do greenhouse gas emission calculations from energy crop cultivation reflect actual agricultural management practices? - A review of carbon footprint calculators
    Peter, Christiane
    Helming, Katharina
    Nendel, Claas
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 67 : 461 - 476