Oviposition preference for novel versus normal food resources in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster

被引:52
|
作者
Sheeba, V [1 ]
Madhyastha, NAA [1 ]
Joshi, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Nehru Ctr Adv Sci Res, Anim Behav Unit, Evolut & Behav Lab, Bangalore 560064, Karnataka, India
关键词
host specialization; egg laying behaviour; fecundity; oviposition preference; specificity; Drosophila melanogaster;
D O I
10.1007/BF02703000
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Female fecundity, oviposition preference and specificity on one normal and two novel food media were assayed on four laboratory populations of Drosaphila melanogaster, revealing considerable among-and within-population variation in oviposition preference. Overall, there was a significant tendency of females to prefer novel media to their normal banana food as an oviposition substrate. Specificity in the populations was fairly high, implying that a large proportion of females tended to lay the majority of their eggs on the preferred medium. The results showed that oviposition preference for a given food medium could be affected by the alternative provided, and that, consequently, oviposition preference for a given food medium versus another cannot be predicted based upon a knowledge of what the preference for each of the two media was versus a common third medium. Specificity, on the other hand, was not significantly affected by the type of alternative food media provided in a given trial. Moreover, comparison of results from fecundity and oviposition preference assays also showed that the egg laying behaviour of Drosophila females in response to different food media may be different in choice versus no-choice situations. Thus, a substrate on which fecundity is higher than on another, when assayed in a no-choice situation, may not be preferred over the other substrate when a choice between the two is provided to the ovipositing females. The latter two results point to possible complexity in the responses of females to various oviposition substrates based upon the overall setting of the assay, including the alternative substrates present for egg laying.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 100
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oviposition preference for novel versus normal food resources in laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster
    V. Sheeba
    N. A. Aravinda Madhyastha
    Amitabh Joshi
    Journal of Biosciences, 1998, 23 : 93 - 100
  • [2] Bimodal distribution of oviposition preference for a novel food medium in Drosophila melanogaster
    Sheeba, V
    Rajamani, M
    Joshi, A
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1999, 77 (09): : 1197 - 1200
  • [3] Preference for ethanol in feeding and oviposition in temperate and tropical populations of Drosophila melanogaster
    Zhu, Jing
    Fry, James D.
    ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA, 2015, 155 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [4] Oviposition experience affects oviposition preference in Drosophila melanogaster
    Otarola-Jimenez, Julio
    Nataraj, Nandita
    Bisch-Knaden, Sonja
    Hansson, Bill S.
    Knaden, Markus
    ISCIENCE, 2024, 27 (08)
  • [5] SELECTION FOR OVIPOSITION PREFERENCE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    BIRD, SR
    SEMEONOFF, R
    GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1986, 48 (03) : 151 - 160
  • [6] Experimental evolution of color preference for oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster
    Marcus M.
    Burnham T.C.
    Stephens D.W.
    Dunlap A.S.
    Journal of Bioeconomics, 2018, 20 (1) : 125 - 140
  • [7] Sleep contributes to preference for novel food odours in Drosophila melanogaster
    Tanizawa, Fuminori
    Takemoto, Hiroyuki
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [8] Sleep contributes to preference for novel food odours in Drosophila melanogaster
    Fuminori Tanizawa
    Hiroyuki Takemoto
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [9] OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE IN 7 MUTANTS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    RUIZ, G
    LUENGO, M
    RETAMAL, P
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1985, 18 (02): : R165 - R165
  • [10] EFFECT OF SELECTION ON OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER
    DUBREUIL, GR
    DELSOLAR, E
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1986, 39 (02) : 155 - 160