Efficacy of isolated home blood pressure monitoring for blood pressure control: randomized controlled trial with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring - MONITOR study

被引:22
|
作者
Fuchs, Sandra C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ferreira-da-Silva, Andre L. [3 ]
Moreira, Leila B. [3 ]
Neyeloff, Jeruza L. [2 ]
Fuchs, Felipe C. [2 ]
Gus, Miguel
Wiehe, Mario
Fuchs, Flavio D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Ctr Pesquisa Clin, Postgrad Studies Program Cardiol, Div Cardiol, BR-90035903 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Med, Postgrad Studies Program Cardiol, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Sci & Technol Hlth Technol Assessment I, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; blood pressure control; home blood pressure monitoring; hypertension; randomized clinical trial; HYPERTENSION CONTROL; EUROPEAN-SOCIETY; OFFICE; DRUGS;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834e5a4f
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Rates of control of hypertension remain unsatisfactory worldwide and simple methods to encourage patients to adhere to treatments are still necessary. In this randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the efficacy of a protocol of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), without medication titration, to improve BP assessed by ambulatory BPM (ABPM). Methods Patients with hypertension under drug treatment and with uncontrolled BP at office and by 24-h ABPM were randomly assigned to HBPM or usual care. The treatment was not modified during the trial. Follow-up visits were conducted at 7 and 30 days after randomization, and at 60 days to assess the outcome. Deltas between baseline and final ABPM measurements were calculated for 24-h, nightly and daily ambulatory SBP and DBP. Results Of 558 patients screened, 136 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were randomized, and 121 (89%) completed the trial. The between groups deltas (95% confidence interval) of variation of 24 h, nightly and daily SBP were 5.4 (0.9-9.8) (P=0.018), 10.9 (2.9-18.9) (P=0.012) and 4.4 mmHg (-0.1 to 8.8) (P=0.055), respectively; the corresponding deltas for DBP were 4.5 (1.6-7.4) (P=0.003), 3.4 (0.4-6.3) (P=0.025) and 5.8 mmHg (2.5-9.0) (P=0.001), respectively. At the end of the trial, 32.4% of patients of the HBPM groups and 16.2% of the control group had 24-h SBP less than 130/80 mmHg (P=0.03). Conclusion A protocol of HBPM without medication titration enhances the control of BP assessed by ABPM. J Hypertens 30:75-80 (C) 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring on Blood Pressure Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Fuchs, Sandra C.
    Fuchs, Flavio D.
    Moreira, Leila B.
    Gus, Miguel
    Wiehe, Mario
    Fuchs, Felipe C.
    Ferreira, Andre
    Neyeloff, Jeruza L.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (02) : E78 - E78
  • [2] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure control in patients with coronary artery disease-A randomized controlled trial
    Hagglund, Oscar
    Svensson, Per
    Linde, Cecilia
    Ostergren, Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL CARDIOLOGY HYPERTENSION, 2021, 8
  • [3] Preference for Home Blood Pressure Monitoring versus Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring for Measuring Sleep Blood Pressure: The BetterBP Study
    Alanaeme, Chibuike J.
    Wen, Ying
    Chen, Ligong
    Ghazi, Lama
    Lenz, Kellen
    Fang, Chloe
    Poudel, Bharat
    Shimbo, Daichi
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2024, 149
  • [4] Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring: A Comparison of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Home (Self) Monitoring Of Blood Pressure
    Townsend, Raymond R.
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2020, 76 (06) : 1667 - 1673
  • [5] A comparison of office blood pressure, telemedical home blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
    Hoffmann-Petersen, N.
    Tambo, T.
    Pedersen, E. Bjerregaard
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 573 - 573
  • [6] Blood pressure control with monitoring ambulatory blood pressure (AMBP), self-measured blood pressure at home (SMBP) and office blood pressure
    Gomez-Marcos, M. A.
    Garcia-Ortiz, L.
    Gonzalez Elena, L. J.
    Castano-Sanchez, Y.
    Rodriguez, J. I. Recio
    Parra-Sanchez, J.
    Garcia-Garcia, A.
    Cascon-Perez-Teijon, S.
    Gonzalez-Garcia, A.
    Herrero-Rodriguez, C.
    Sanchez-Salgado, B.
    Rodriguez Martin, C.
    Sanchez, C. Castano
    Jimenez, D. Munoz
    De Cabo-Laso, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S292 - S292
  • [7] Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Heart Transplant Recipients: Comparison with Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
    Ambrosi, Pierre
    Kreitmann, Bernard
    Habib, Gilbert
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (03) : 363 - 367
  • [8] Impact of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure control in older individuals: a French randomized study
    Tzourio, Christophe
    Hanon, Olivier
    Godin, Ophelia
    Soumare, Aicha
    Dufouil, Carole
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 (03) : 612 - 620
  • [9] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: mean blood pressure and blood pressure load
    Susan Koshy
    Colin Macarthur
    Sanjeev Luthra
    Mukesh Gajaria
    Denis Geary
    [J]. Pediatric Nephrology, 2005, 20 : 1484 - 1486
  • [10] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: mean blood pressure and blood pressure load
    Koshy, S
    Macarthur, C
    Luthra, S
    Gajaria, M
    Geary, D
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 20 (10) : 1484 - 1486