Strategic formulation and communication of corporate environmental policy statements: UK firms' perspective

被引:14
|
作者
Kuk, G
Fokeer, S
Hung, WT
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Nottingham NG8 1BB, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Chem Environm & Min Engn, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Business, Kuala Lumpur 50450, Malaysia
关键词
corporate environmental policy statements; strategy; UKFTSE firms;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-004-8316-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper suggests that most of the FTSE-listed firms in the United Kingdom use corporate environmental policy statements (CEPS) to communicate their strategic intent of what environmental and social targets to attain, and broad guidelines of how they will progressively achieve all the required changes and new developments. In this paper, we link the contents of CEPS of a sample of FTSE-listed firms (from the chemical, pharmaceutical and food industry that are committed to develop business excellence) to the voluntary participation in the environmental benchmarking exercise and the various levels of environmental performance therein. The findings suggest that in contrast to their non-participating counterparts, the strategic focus of the participating firms transcends from simply mitigating any potential damages that their operations might have on the environment to business process reengineering and building new implementation capabilities. However, not all of the participating firms achieved excellence in their environmental performance, the high performing firms outweighed their counterparts on their emphasis on technological competence and competitiveness, and interestingly, the average-performing firms would use the strategic emphasis on social responsibility to compensate for their mediocre technological competence.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 385
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Strategic Formulation and Communication of Corporate Environmental Policy Statements: UK Firms’ Perspective
    George Kuk
    Smeeta Fokeer
    Woan Ting Hung
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 58 : 375 - 385
  • [2] Strategic Environmental Policy and the Mobility of Firms
    Richter, Philipp M.
    Runkel, Marco
    Schmidt, Robert C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2021, 8 (05) : 863 - 893
  • [3] Trial runs as environmental policy with strategic firms
    Shinkuma, Takayoshi
    Sugeta, Hajime
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2022, 24 (02) : 285 - 303
  • [4] Trial runs as environmental policy with strategic firms
    Takayoshi Shinkuma
    Hajime Sugeta
    [J]. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2022, 24 : 285 - 303
  • [5] Corporate Strategic Mission Statements Quality and Financial Performance: An Analysis on Chinese Firms
    Shao Jianbing
    Liu Ligang
    Liu Yu
    Meng Xiushi
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING: ENTERPRISE, ENVIRONMENT AND CRISIS, 2009, : 538 - 544
  • [6] Corporate strategy formulation and taxation: Evidence from UK firms
    Glaister, Keith W.
    Hughes, Jane Frecknall
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2008, 19 (01) : 33 - 48
  • [7] Corporate environmental responsibility in China: a strategic political perspective
    Wang, Wei
    Zhao, Chunxiang
    Jiang, Xinfeng
    Huang, Yiming
    Li, Sihai
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2021, 12 (01) : 220 - 239
  • [8] Corporate social responsibility and dividend policy: a strategic choice in family firms
    Sheikh, Muhammad Fayyaz
    Bhutta, Aamir Inam
    Rehman, Bareera
    Bazil, Muhammad
    Hassan, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 12 (02) : 296 - 315
  • [9] A strategic environmental assessment method for agricultural policy in the UK
    Tzilivakis, J
    Broom, C
    Lewis, KA
    Tucker, P
    Drummond, C
    Cook, R
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 1999, 16 (04) : 223 - 234
  • [10] Dynamic environmental policy with strategic firms: prices versus quantities
    Moledina, AA
    Coggins, JS
    Polasky, S
    Costello, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) : 356 - 376