The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto

被引:79
|
作者
Gibson, James L. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nelson, Michael J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Weidenbaum Ctr Econ Govt & Publ Policy, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Program Citizenship & Democrat Values, Weidenbaum Ctr Econ Govt & Publ Policy, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Univ Stellenbosch, Ctr Comparat & Int Polit, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[4] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Polit Sci, ZA-7600 Stellenbosch, South Africa
[5] Penn State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
legitimacy theory; US Supreme Court; compliance with law; public opinion; PUBLIC-OPINION; INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY; CONDITIONAL RESPONSE; LEGAL REALISM; SUPPORT; IMPACT; DECISIONS; POLICY; MATTER; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Research on the legitimacy of the US Supreme Court has blossomed of late, with scholars investigating many different hypotheses derived from legitimacy theory. As the theory has been pushed, a number of new controversies have emerged. Here, we identify four such debates: (a) whether the Court's legitimacy rests on satisfaction with its performance, (b) whether support for the Supreme Court reflects the polarization of politics in the contemporary United States, (c) whether the Court's legitimacy requires belief in the "myth of legality", and (d) whether judicial decisions can change public opinion. Our analysis of these issues generally concludes that the Supreme Court's legitimacy is reasonably secure, in part because individual rulings have little impact on support for the institution, in part because the Court has access to powerful and influential symbols of judicial authority, and in part because the current Supreme Court issues roughly equal numbers of conservative and liberal decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 219
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条