Aligning Organizational Priorities With ARC to Improve Youth Mental Health Service Outcomes

被引:19
|
作者
Glisson, Charles [1 ]
Williams, Nathaniel J. [2 ]
Hemmelgarn, Anthony [1 ]
Proctor, Enola [3 ]
Green, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Behav Hlth Res, Henley Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Boise State Univ, Coll Social Work, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Brown Sch Social Work, St Louis, MO USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ARC; organizational intervention; organizational priorities; youth mental health; service improvement; FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES; SHORTFORM ASSESSMENT; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; SOCIAL-CONTEXT; CHILD-WELFARE; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; CARE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; INTERVENTION; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
10.1037/ccp0000107
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: The Availability, Responsiveness, and Continuity (ARC) organizational intervention is designed to improve community-based youth mental health services by aligning organizational priorities with 5 principles of effective service organizations (i.e., mission driven, results oriented, improvement directed, relationship centered, participation based). This study assessed the effect of the ARC intervention on youth outcomes and the mediating role of organizational priorities as a mechanism linking the ARC intervention to outcomes. Method: Fourteen community-based mental health agencies in a midwestern metropolis along with 475 clinicians and 605 youth (ages 5-18) served by those agencies were randomly assigned to the 3-year ARC intervention or control condition. The agencies' priorities were measured with the ARC Principles Questionnaire (APQ) completed by clinicians at the end of the intervention. Youth outcomes were measured as total problems in psychosocial functioning described by their caregivers using the Shortform Assessment for Children (SAC) at 6 monthly intervals. Results: The rate of improvement in youths' psychosocial functioning in agencies assigned to the ARC condition was 1.6 times the rate of improvement in agencies assigned to the control condition, creating a standardized difference in functioning of d = .23 between the 2 groups at the 6-month follow-up. The effect on youth outcomes was fully mediated by the alignment of organizational priorities described in the 5 ARC principles (d = .21). Conclusion: The ARC organizational intervention improves youth outcomes by aligning organizational priorities with the 5 ARC principles. The findings suggest that organizational priorities explain why some community mental health agencies are more effective than others.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 725
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aligning Research Priorities to Improve Equity: A Challenge for Health Funders
    Plough, Alonzo L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2018, 18 (11): : 1 - 2
  • [2] Randomized Trial of the Availability, Responsiveness and Continuity (ARC) Organizational Intervention for Improving Youth Outcomes in Community Mental Health Programs
    Glisson, Charles
    Hemmelgarn, Anthony
    Green, Philip
    Williams, Nathaniel J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 52 (05): : 493 - 500
  • [3] Global research priorities for youth mental health
    Mei, Cristina
    Fitzsimons, Joanna
    Allen, Nicholas
    Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario
    Amminger, Gunter Paul
    Browne, Vivienne
    Cannon, Mary
    Davis, Maryann
    Dooley, Barbara
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Iyer, Srividya
    Killackey, Eoin
    Malla, Ashok
    Manion, Ian
    Mathias, Steve
    Pennell, Kerryn
    Purcell, Rosemary
    Rickwood, Debra
    Singh, Swaran P.
    Wood, Stephen J.
    Yung, Alison
    McGorry, Patrick D.
    [J]. EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 14 (01) : 3 - 13
  • [4] The Effects of Organizational Culture on Mental Health Service Engagement of Transition Age Youth
    Kim, HyunSoo
    Tracy, Elizabeth M.
    Biegel, David E.
    Min, Meeyoung O.
    Munson, Michelle R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES & RESEARCH, 2015, 42 (04): : 466 - 485
  • [5] The Effects of Organizational Culture on Mental Health Service Engagement of Transition Age Youth
    HyunSoo Kim
    Elizabeth M. Tracy
    David E. Biegel
    Meeyoung O. Min
    Michelle R. Munson
    [J]. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 2015, 42 : 466 - 485
  • [6] Priorities to improve health outcomes - In reply
    Woolf, Steven H.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (21): : 2346 - 2347
  • [7] FEDERAL EFFORTS TO IMPROVE MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE USE OUTCOMES FOR YOUTH
    Pao, Maryland
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 58 (10): : S319 - S319
  • [8] Can system integration improve mental health outcomes for children and youth?
    Foster, E. Michael
    Stephens, Robert
    Krivelyova, Anna
    Gamfi, Phyllis
    [J]. CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2007, 29 (10) : 1301 - 1319
  • [9] Aligning oral mesalazine treatment to health service priorities: guidance for nurses
    Kemp, Karen
    Sephton, Mark
    [J]. FRONTLINE GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 5 (02) : 135 - 142
  • [10] MENTAL-HEALTH-SERVICE PRIORITIES AND THE BSW
    RUBIN, A
    KATZ, AJ
    POWELL, KS
    [J]. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 1982, 18 (02) : 159 - 168