Artificial Bowel Sphincter Implantation for Faecal Incontinence in Asian Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Chittawatanarat, Kaweesak [1 ]
Koh, Dean C. [1 ]
Seah, Aileen A. [1 ]
Cheong, Wai-Kit [1 ]
Tsang, Charles B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Div Colorectal Surg, Dept Surg, Singapore 119072, Singapore
关键词
Action; artificial bowel sphincter; Asians; faecal incontinence; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ANAL-SPHINCTER; COMPLICATIONS; NEOSPHINCTER; INSTITUTION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/S1015-9584(10)60023-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the outcomes with the American Medical Systems artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) implantation for the treatment of intractable faecal incontinence in an Asian population. METHODS: Six Asian patients who underwent ABS implantation between March 2004 and December 2007 for the treatment of faecal incontinence were reviewed. RESULTS: The ABS was successfully implanted in six patients [mean age SO (20-73) years; 4 males]. The most common causes of incontinence were congenital anomaly of the anus (imperforate anus status post a pull-through procedure) and status-post ultralow anterior resection. Two patients required device explantation due to postoperative infection. One eventually required a colostomy. After a mean follow-up of 22 (4-36) months, four patients continued to have a functional artificial bowel sphincter. Faecal incontinence severity scores improved from a mean of 13 (12-14) to 6 (0-9) postactivation. Anal manometry showed an increase in mean resting pressures (19.2 +/- 7.5 mmHg vs. postirnplantation with cuff inflated 45.0 +/- 12.0 mmHg). The comparative preoperative and postactivation faecal incontinence quality of life scores showed improvement in all aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with successful ABS implantation benefited from improved outcomes in function and quality of life. Infection was the most common cause of failure in our patients. [Asian J Surg 2010;33(3):134-42]
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 142
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
    Jarno Melenhorst
    Sacha M. Koch
    Wim G. van Gemert
    Cor G. Baeten
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2008, 23 : 107 - 111
  • [2] The artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: a single centre study
    Melenhorst, Jarno
    Koch, Sacha M.
    van Gemert, Wim G.
    Baeten, Cor G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 23 (01) : 107 - 111
  • [3] Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence
    Mundy, L
    Merlin, TL
    Maddern, GJ
    Hiller, JE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (06) : 665 - 672
  • [4] The Artificial Sphincter: Therapy for Faecal Incontinence
    Baumgartner, U.
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2012, 137 (04): : 340 - 344
  • [5] Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence
    Altomare, DF
    Dodi, G
    La Torre, F
    Romano, G
    Melega, E
    Rinaldi, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (11) : 1481 - 1486
  • [6] IMPLANTATION OF ARTIFICIAL SPHINCTER FOR ANAL INCONTINENCE
    CHRISTIANSEN, J
    LORENTZEN, M
    [J]. LANCET, 1987, 2 (8553): : 244 - 245
  • [7] Faecal incontinence: dynamic graciloplasty or artificial anal sphincter?
    Ortiz, H
    Yarnoz, C
    de Miguel, M
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2001, 93 (02) : 130 - 131
  • [8] Value of sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of severe faecal incontinence: a comparison to the artificial bowel sphincter
    Meurette, G.
    La Torre, M.
    Regenet, N.
    Robert-Yap, J.
    Lehur, P. A.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (06) : 631 - 635
  • [9] Incontinence after Implantation of an artificial Urinary Sphincter
    Hess, Jochen
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (07): : 962 - 962
  • [10] Selecting patients with faecal incontinence for anal sphincter surgery: the influence of irritable bowel syndrome
    Chaudhary, B. N.
    Chadwick, M.
    Roe, A. M.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2010, 12 (08) : 750 - 753