Scintigraphic, Histologic, and Histomorphometric Analyses of Bovine Bone Mineral and Autogenous Bone Mixture in Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial-Results After 4 Months of Healing

被引:23
|
作者
Pikdoken, Levent [1 ]
Gurbuzer, Bahadir [2 ]
Kucukodaci, Zafer [3 ]
Urban, Muammer [4 ]
Baris, Emre [5 ]
Tezulas, Emre
机构
[1] Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Dent, Sect Periodontol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Dent, Sect Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Nucl Med, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Gazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral Pathol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
FACIAL SKELETON; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; ELEVATION; HUMANS; COMBINATION; SUBSTITUTE; BIO-OSS(R); TC-99M-MDP;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.036
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To test our null hypothesis stating that the mixture of autogenous cortical bone scrapings and bovine bone mineral (BBM) in a ratio of 1:4, compared with BBM alone, would have no significant effect on new bone formation 4 months after maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Patients and Methods: Twenty-four patients presenting with alveolar bone height of less than 5 mm in the narrowest zone between the sinus floor and alveolar crest were randomly assigned to 2 treatment groups in this randomized controlled trial. We augmented 12 maxillary sinuses with a mixture of BBM and cortical autogenous bone graft, which was collected from the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus by a bone scraper, and 12 maxillary sinuses with BBM alone. Four months postoperatively, new bone formation in the augmented sinus sites was evaluated through bone scintigraphy, as well as histologic and histomorphometric analyses of the biopsy specimens obtained during implant placement. Data were statistically analyzed by independent-samples t test. Results: Scintigraphically detectable new bone formation did not differ significantly between the groups (P > .05). Histologic findings showed that the new bone bridged between BBM particles and BBM underwent resorption by osteoclasts with or without the addition of autogenous bone graft. According to histomorphometric findings, the difference between the percentages of newly formed bone in the sinuses augmented with graft mixture (25.73%) and BBM alone (24.19%) was statistically nonsignificant (P > .05). Conclusions: The addition of autogenous cortical bone scrapings to BBM in a ratio of 1:4, compared with BBM alone, does not markedly increase new bone formation 4 months after maxillary sinus lifting. (C) 2011 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:160-160, 2011
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 169
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation - Results after 6 to 8 months of healing
    Hallman, M
    Cederlund, A
    Lindskog, S
    Lundgren, S
    Sennerby, L
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (02) : 135 - 143
  • [2] Maxillary Sinus Grafting With Biphasic Bone Ceramic or Autogenous Bone: Clinical, Histologic, and Histomorphometric Results From a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Danesh-Sani, Seyed A.
    Wallace, Stephen S.
    Movahed, Ali
    El Chaar, Edgard S.
    Cho, Sang-Choon
    Khouly, Ismael
    Testori, Tiziano
    IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (05) : 588 - 593
  • [3] Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation With Autogenous Bone Versus Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed With 25% Autogenous Bone: A 1-Year Multicenter, Split-Mouth, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jue, Anouck
    Pijpe, Justin
    Wolvius, Eppo
    Naenni, Nadja
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Jonker, Brend
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [4] Bone augmentation of the inferior floor of the maxillary sinus with autogenous bone or composite bone grafts: A histologic-histomorphometric preliminary report
    Lorenzetti, M
    Mozzati, M
    Campanino, PP
    Valente, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [5] A histomorphometric assessment of collagen-stabilized anorganic bovine bone mineral in maxillary sinus augmentation a randomized controlled trial in sheep
    Alayan, Jamil
    Vaquette, Cedryck
    Saifzadeh, Siamak
    Hutmacher, Dietmar
    Ivanovski, Saso
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (06) : 734 - 743
  • [6] Deproteinized bovine bone and freeze-dried bone allograft in sinus floor augmentation: A randomized controlled trial
    Kungvarnchaikul, Isaya
    Subbalekha, Keskanya
    Sindhavajiva, Pimrumpai R.
    Suwanwela, Jaijam
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 25 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [7] Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial
    Rickert, D.
    Sauerbier, S.
    Nagursky, H.
    Menne, D.
    Vissink, A.
    Raghoebar, G. M.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (03) : 251 - 258
  • [8] A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture
    Hallman, M
    Sennerby, L
    Lundgren, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2002, 17 (05) : 635 - 643
  • [9] Bone regeneration after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with different ratios of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone mineral an in vivo experimental study
    Starch-Jensen, Thomas
    Schou, Soren
    Terheyden, Hendrik
    Bruun, Niels Henrik
    Aludden, Hanna
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (12) : 1406 - 1416
  • [10] Bone reaction to bovine hydroxyapatite for maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Histologic results in humans
    Lee, Yong-Moo
    Shin, Seung-Yun
    Kim, Jin Y.
    Kye, Seung-Beom
    Ku, Young
    Rhyu, In-Chul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 26 (05) : 471 - 481