Rethinking Greulich and Pyle: A Deep Learning Approach to Pediatric Bone Age Assessment Using Pediatric Trauma Hand Radiographs

被引:23
|
作者
Pan, Ian [1 ]
Baird, Grayson L. [2 ]
Mutasa, Simukayi [3 ]
Merck, Derek [4 ]
Ruzal-Shapiro, Carrie [3 ]
Swenson, David W. [1 ]
Ayyala, Rama S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Hasbro Childrens Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging,Rhode Isl Hosp, 593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Lifespan Biostat Core, Providence, RI USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Florida, Shards Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/ryai.2020190198
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a deep learning approach to bone age assessment based on a training set of developmentally normal pediatric hand radiographs and to compare this approach with automated and manual bone age assessment methods based on Greulich and Pyle (GP). Methods: In this retrospective study, a convolutional neural network (trauma hand radiograph-trained deep learning bone age assessment method [TDL-BAAM]) was trained on 15 129 frontal view pediatric trauma hand radiographs obtained between December 14, 2009, and May 31, 2017, from Children's Hospital of New York, to predict chronological age. A total of 214 trauma hand radiographs from Hasbro Children's Hospital were used as an independent test set. The test set was rated by the TDL-BAAM model as well as a GP-based deep learning model (GPDL-BAAM) and two pediatric radiologists (radiologists 1 and 2) using the GP method. All ratings were compared with chronological age using mean absolute error (MAE), and standard concordance analyses were performed. Results: The MAE of the TDL-BAAM model was 11.1 months, compared with 12.9 months for GPDL-BAAM (P=.0005), 14.6 months for radiologist 1 (P<.0001), and 16.0 for radiologist 2 (P<.0001). For TDL-BAAM, 95.3% of predictions were within 24 months of chronological age compared with 91.6% for GPDL-BAAM (P=.096), 86.0% for radiologist 1 (P<.0001), and 84.6% for radiologist 2 (P<.0001). Concordance was high between all methods and chronological age (intraclass coefficient > 0.93). Deep learning models demonstrated a systematic bias with a tendency to overpredict age for younger children versus radiologists who showed a consistent mean bias. Conclusion: A deep learning model trained on pediatric trauma hand radiographs is on par with automated and manual GP-based methods for bone age assessment and provides a foundation for developing population-specific deep learning algorithms for bone age assessment in modern pediatric populations. (C) RSNA, 2020
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generalizability and Bias in a Deep Learning Pediatric Bone Age Prediction Model Using Hand Radiographs
    Beheshtian, Elham
    Putman, Kristin
    Santomartino, Samantha M.
    Parekh, Vishwa S.
    Yi, Paul H.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 306 (02)
  • [2] Effect of knowledge of chronologic age on the variability of pediatric bone age determined using the Greulich and Pyle standards
    Berst, MJ
    Dolan, L
    Bogdanowicz, MM
    Stevens, MA
    Chow, S
    Brandser, EA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) : 507 - 510
  • [3] Age estimation by hand and wrist radiographs using the Greulich and Pyle method in a southern Thailand population
    Jeamtrakool, Suttiwat
    Duangto, Phuwadon
    Theerasopon, Pornpat
    Charoemratrote, Chairat
    Nabheerong, Pennipat
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES, 2024,
  • [4] Bone Age Assessment Using Artificial Intelligence in Korean Pediatric Population: A Comparison of Deep-Learning Models Trained With Healthy Chronological and Greulich-Pyle Ages as Labels
    Kim, Pyeong Hwa
    Yoon, Hee Mang
    Kim, Jeong Rye
    Hwang, Jae-Yeon
    Choi, Jin -Ho
    Hwang, Jisun
    Lee, Jaewon
    Sung, Jinkyeong
    Jung, Kyu-Hwan
    Bae, Byeonguk
    Jung, Ah Young
    Cho, Young Ah
    Shim, Woo Hyun
    Bak, Boram
    Lee, Jin Seong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 24 (11) : 1151 - 1163
  • [5] The Validation of the Greulich and Pyle Atlas for Radiological Bone Age Assessments in a Pediatric Population from the Canary Islands
    Perez, Isidro Miguel Martin
    Perez, Sebastian Eustaquio Martin
    Gonzalez, Jesus Maria Vega
    Suarez, Ruth Molina
    Hernandez, Alfonso Miguel Garcia
    Hernandez, Fidel Rodriguez
    Perez, Mario Herrera
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (18)
  • [6] Automated bone age assessment in a German pediatric cohort: agreement between an artificial intelligence software and the manual Greulich and Pyle method
    Graefe, Daniel
    Beeskow, Anne Bettina
    Pfaeffle, Roland
    Rosolowski, Maciej
    Chung, Tek Sin
    Difranco, Matthew David
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (07) : 4407 - 4413
  • [7] Skeletal development of the hand and wrist: digital bone age companion—a suitable alternative to the Greulich and Pyle atlas for bone age assessment?
    Paul M. Bunch
    Talissa A. Altes
    Joan McIlhenny
    James Patrie
    Cree M. Gaskin
    Skeletal Radiology, 2017, 46 : 785 - 793
  • [8] Pediatric age estimation from radiographs of the knee using deep learning
    Demircioglu, Aydin
    Quinsten, Anton S.
    Forsting, Michael
    Umutlu, Lale
    Nassenstein, Kai
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (07) : 4813 - 4822
  • [9] Pediatric age estimation from radiographs of the knee using deep learning
    Aydin Demircioğlu
    Anton S. Quinsten
    Michael Forsting
    Lale Umutlu
    Kai Nassenstein
    European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 4813 - 4822
  • [10] Multi-Site Assessment of Pediatric Bone Age Using Deep Learning
    Valliani, Aly A.
    Schwartz, John T.
    Arvind, Varun
    Taree, Amir
    Kim, Jun S.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    ACM-BCB 2020 - 11TH ACM CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS, COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, AND HEALTH INFORMATICS, 2020,