Assessing the reflective characteristics of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) accessions

被引:4
|
作者
Gray, Cody J.
Shaw, David R.
Bond, Jason A.
Stephenson, Daniel O.
Oliver, Lawrence R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Delta Res & Extens Ctr, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas, NE Arkansas Res & Extens Ctr, Keiser, AR 72351 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
关键词
classification accuracies; hyperspectral reflectance; remote sensing; weed differentiation;
D O I
10.1614/WS-06-041
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A hand-held hyperspectral radiometer was used to measure differences in reflectance characteristics of 24 Palmer amaranth and 15 pitted morningglory accessions collected from the central and southern United States. A hyperspectral reflectance reading was collected from two mature leaves at 24 and 27 d after emergence (DAE) for each accession. Two analysis techniques, linear discriminant analysis and best spectral-band combination (BSBC) analysis, were performed using various vegetation indice.;, spectral bands, and individual wavelengths. Differentiation of individual accessions was difficult. Palmer amaranth accession classification accuracies were < 50% using both analysis techniques, except one accession collected in South Carolina (63%), when pooled over data acquisition dates. Pitted morningglory accession classification accuracies were also generally < 50%. Classification accuracies were higher using BSBC analysis at 24 DAE; however, at 27 DAE only one accession resulted in classification accuracy > 30%. These results suggest there are only slight reflectance differences within Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory accessions. These differences may not be predictable based upon accession origin because of the genetic diversity of Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory. However, differentiation between Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory was 100%. Thus, spectral sensors used to differentiate between Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory do not need to be calibrated for a particular region of the United States, and differentiation between these two species can be made using reflectance characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 298
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of isothiocyanates for suppression of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)
    Norsworthy, JK
    Meehan, JT
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (06) : 884 - 890
  • [2] Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of Glufosinate in Transgenic and Nontransgenic Cotton, Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), and Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)
    Everman, Wesley J.
    Thomas, Walter E.
    Burton, James D.
    York, Alan C.
    Wilcut, John W.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2009, 57 (04) : 357 - 361
  • [3] Response of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) accessions to chlorimuron, fomesafen, and glyphosate
    Stephenson, Daniel O.
    Oliver, Lawrence R.
    Bond, Jason A.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 179 - 185
  • [4] Comparative growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions
    Bond, JA
    Oliver, LR
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2006, 54 (01) : 121 - 126
  • [5] Differential response of palmleaf morningglory (Ipomoea wrightii) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) to flooding
    Gealy, D
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [6] Response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen, and pyrithiobac
    Bond, Jason A.
    Oliver, Lawrence R.
    Stephenson, Daniel O.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (04) : 885 - 892
  • [7] Response of northeastern Arkansas Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus Palmeri) accessions to glyphosate
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Scott, Robert C.
    Smith, Kenneth L.
    Oliver, Lawrence R.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 408 - 413
  • [8] Glyphosate efficacy, absorption, and translocation in pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)
    Koger, CH
    Reddy, KN
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (03) : 277 - 283
  • [9] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): A Review
    Ward, Sarah M.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    Steckel, Larry E.
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 12 - 27
  • [10] Effect of glyphosate spray coverage on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa)
    Koger, CH
    Poston, DH
    Reddy, KN
    [J]. WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) : 124 - 130