On object classification: Artificial vs. natural

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, M [1 ]
Park, C
Koo, K
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Pusan 609735, South Korea
[2] Youngsan Univ, Sch Multimedia Engn, Pusan, South Korea
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Recently semantic classification of images is of great interest for image indexing applications. On the one hand, researchers in the field of content-based image retrieval are interested in object(s) of interest in an image, which is useful for representing the image. In this paper, we present a semantic classification method of the object(s) of interest into artificial/natural classes. We first show that dominant orientation features in Gabor filtering results of artificial objects are very useful for discriminating them from natural objects. Dominant orientations in artificial object images are not confined to horizontal and/or vertical directions, while those in artificial scene images tend to be greatly confined to them. Two classification measures are proposed; the sum of sector power differences in Fourier power spectrum and the energy of edge direction histogram. They show classification accuracy of 85.8% and 84.8% on a test with 2,600 object images, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 539
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Natural vs. artificial aging
    Krall, S
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY, 1929, 21 : 1009 - 1012
  • [2] Artificial vs. Natural Neural Networks
    Lacrama, Dan L.
    Viscu, Loredana Ileana
    Drugarin, Cornelia Victoria Anghel
    [J]. 2016 13TH SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND APPLICATIONS (NEUREL), 2016, : 1 - 1
  • [3] Odor Recognition vs. Classification in Artificial Olfaction
    Raman, Baranidharan
    Hertz, Joshua
    Benkstein, Kurt
    Semancik, Steve
    [J]. OLFACTION AND ELECTRONIC NOSE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OLFACTION AND ELECTRONIC NOSE, 2011, 1362 : 69 - +
  • [4] Natural object classification using artificial neural networks
    Singh, S
    Markou, M
    Haddon, J
    [J]. IJCNN 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE-INNS-ENNS INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL III, 2000, : 139 - 144
  • [5] Natural vs. artificial cannabinoid oils: the comparison of their antioxidant activities
    Dawidowicz, Andrzej L.
    Typek, Rafal
    Olszowy-Tomczyk, Malgorzata
    [J]. EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 249 (02) : 359 - 366
  • [6] Functional morphology in modern horses: natural vs. artificial selection
    Mchorse, B. K.
    Hopkins, S. S. B.
    Davis, E. B.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 53 : E330 - E330
  • [7] FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY IN MODERN HORSES: NATURAL VS. ARTIFICIAL SELECTION
    Mchorse, Brianna K.
    Davis, Edward B.
    Hopkins, Samantha S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, 2012, 32 : 139 - 139
  • [8] Natural vs. artificial cannabinoid oils: the comparison of their antioxidant activities
    Andrzej L. Dawidowicz
    Rafał Typek
    Małgorzata Olszowy-Tomczyk
    [J]. European Food Research and Technology, 2023, 249 : 359 - 366
  • [9] Natural vs. artificial groundwater recharge, quantification through inverse modeling
    Hashemi, H.
    Berndtsson, R.
    Kompani-Zare, M.
    Persson, M.
    [J]. HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (02) : 637 - 650
  • [10] Cryptogams in calcareous grassland restoration: perspectives for artificial vs. natural colonization
    Jeschke, Michael
    [J]. TUEXENIA, 2012, (32): : 269 - 279