The Final Solvency II Framework: Will It Be Effective?

被引:9
|
作者
Doff, Rene [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Quantitat Econ, PO 19268, NL-1000 GG Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Solvency II; insurance regulation; prudential supervision; risk management; ERM; AGENCY THEORY; RISK; INSURANCE; CRISIS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1057/gpp.2016.4
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
With Solvency II ready for implementation as per 2016, it is a good time to analyse the effectiveness of the framework. We build on earlier analyses of the preliminary framework dating from 2009. In the meantime many improvements have been implemented. We use 12 criteria to assess the effectiveness of Solvency II, and conclude that overall, Solvency II is effective. Not surprisingly, Solvency II is a major step ahead compared with the current supervisory framework. However, violations to some criteria remain. While some violations are because of simplifications, others are because of a lack of focus on particular risks (government bonds, inflation risk, liquidity risk). To resolve some of these violations, we propose specific prescribed and targeted stress tests through the own risk and solvency assessment and a more detailed focus on the effectiveness of governance structures.
引用
收藏
页码:587 / 607
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Final Solvency II Framework: Will It Be Effective?
    René Doff
    [J]. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2016, 41 : 587 - 607
  • [2] Omnibus II effective measures in adjusting the current Solvency II framework
    Peleckiene, Valentina
    Peleckis, Kestutis
    [J]. 2ND INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - CONTEMPORARY ISSUES IN BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATION 2013, 2014, 110 : 156 - 163
  • [3] RISK MEASUREMENT IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN THE SOLVENCY II FRAMEWORK
    Burca, Ana-Maria
    Armeanu, Stefan Daniel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS (AMIS 2013), 2013, : 66 - 80
  • [4] Applications of Distributed and Parallel Computing in the Solvency II Framework: The DISAR System
    Castellani, Gilberto
    Passalacqua, Luca
    [J]. EURO-PAR 2010 PARALLEL PROCESSING WORKSHOPS, 2011, 6586 : 413 - 421
  • [5] Common shock approach to default risk of reinsurance: Solvency II framework
    Hendrych, Radek
    Cipra, Tomas
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS (MME 2018), 2018, : 133 - 138
  • [6] The impact of ERM on insurer performance under the Solvency II regulatory framework
    Otero Gonzalez, Luis
    Duran Santomil, Pablo
    Hoyt, Robert E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023, 29 (04): : 419 - 443
  • [7] Optimal allocation of model risk appetite and validation threshold in the Solvency II framework
    Lin, Liyi
    Heemskerk, Marc
    Dekker, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK MODEL VALIDATION, 2018, 12 (03): : 29 - 49
  • [8] Long-term insurance products and volatility under the Solvency II Framework
    van den Broek, Korneel
    [J]. EUROPEAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 4 (02) : 315 - 334
  • [9] FUNDAMENTAL DEFINITION OF THE SOLVENCY CAPITAL REQUIREMENT IN SOLVENCY II
    Christiansen, Marcus C.
    Niemeyer, Andreas
    [J]. ASTIN BULLETIN, 2014, 44 (03): : 501 - 533
  • [10] Equity risk analysis in the solvency II framework: internal models versus the standard model
    Duran Santomil, Pablo
    Otero Gonzalez, Luis A.
    Fernandez Lopez, Sara
    Vivel Bua, Milagros
    [J]. CUADERNOS DE ECONOMIA Y DIRECCION DE LA EMPRESA, 2011, 14 (02): : 91 - 101