共 50 条
Probing the distance-duality relation with high-z data
被引:30
|作者:
Holanda, R. F. L.
[1
,2
,3
]
Busti, V. C.
[4
,5
]
Lima, F. S.
[2
]
Alcaniz, J. S.
[6
]
机构:
[1] Univ Estadual Paraiba, Dept Fis, BR-58429500 Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Campina Grande, Dept Fis, BR-58429900 Campina Grande, PB, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Norte, Dept Fis, BR-59072970 Natal, RN, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Fis, Dept Fis Matemat, BR-05508090 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Penn, Dept Phys & Astron, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[6] Observ Nacl, Dept Astron, BR-20921400 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源:
基金:
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词:
gamma ray burst experiments;
gravitational lensing;
supernova type Ia - standard candles;
X-RAY;
CONSTRAINTS;
GALAXIES;
STATISTICS;
CLUSTERS;
DYNAMICS;
LENSES;
D O I:
10.1088/1475-7516/2017/09/039
中图分类号:
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号:
0704 ;
摘要:
Measurements of strong gravitational lensing jointly with type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) observations have been used to test the validity of the cosmic distance duality relation (CDDR), D-L (z) = [(1 + z)(2) D-A (z)] = eta = 1, where D-L (z) and D-A (z) are the luminosity and the angular diameter distances to a given redshift z, respectively. However, several lensing systems lie in the interval 1 : 4 <= z <= 3 : 6 i. e., beyond the redshift range of current SNe Ia compilations (z approximate to 1 : 50), which prevents this kind of test to be fully explored. In this paper, we circumvent this problem by testing the CDDR considering observations of strong gravitational lensing along with SNe Ia and a subsample from the latest gamma-ray burst distance modulus data, whose redshift range is 0 : 033 <= z <= 9 : 3. We parameterize their luminosity distances with a second degree polynomial function and search for possible deviations from the CDDR validity by using four di ff erent eta(z) functions: eta(z) = 1 + eta(0) z, eta(z) = 1 + eta(0) z = (1 + z), eta (z) = (1 + z) eta(0) and eta (z) = 1 + eta(0) ln(1 + z). Unlike previous tests done at redshifts lower than 1 : 50, the likelihood for eta(0) depends strongly on the eta (z) function considered, but we fi nd no signi fi cant deviation from the CDDR validity (eta(0) = 0). However, our analyses also point to the fact that caution is needed when one fi ts data in higher redshifts to test the CDDR as well as a better understanding of the mass distribution of lenses also is required for more accurate results.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文