Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of a flexible wall retaining EPS composite soil

被引:25
|
作者
Gao, Hongmei [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Ying [2 ]
Wang, Zhihua [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chao [2 ]
Chen, Guoxing [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Tech Univ, Res Ctr Urban Underground Space, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Tech Univ, Inst Geotech Engn, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
EPS composite soil; Flexible retaining wall; Shaking table test; Dynamic earth thrust; Dynamic wall-soil interaction; EARTH PRESSURE; BEHAVIOR; DISPLACEMENT; CEMENT; SAND; BEADS;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-017-0189-4
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A series of shaking table tests were designed and conducted to study the seismic performance of an inverted T-shape cantilever retaining wall with an anti-sliding tooth at the base using EPS composite soil as backfills. For comparison, the same wall model retaining Nanjing fine sand was simultaneously excited. The macro phenomena and seismic behaviors of two wall-soil systems are depicted in detail and analyzed. The displacement mode of the non-sliding flexible retaining wall and distribution characteristics of dynamic earth pressure acting on the wall back retaining two types of backfills are emphasized. The testing results show that, as a kind of backfill, Nanjing fine sand has a greater peak ground acceleration (PGA) than EPS composite soil under the kinematic interaction between wall and soil, while the difference in the inertial force of the retaining wall itself is not obvious. As the input peak base acceleration increases, Nanjing fine sand which possesses the compaction strength gradually transforms from the global shearing deformation to the wedge sliding deformation, while EPS composite soil with a cemented strength exhibits the block shearing deformation mode under all excitations. The tested retaining walls with the rotation displacement are non-sliding flexible walls. The dynamic deformation mode of backfills is closely related to the inertial interaction between wall and soil, which results in a significant difference in the dynamic earth pressure increment distribution between the walls retaining two types of backfills. The dynamic earth thrust in the retaining wall-Nanjing fine sand system (WSS) has a nonlinear relation with PGA, and the action position approximated 2/3 wall height. A linear relation is more suitable for retaining EPS composite soil and the corresponding action position is about 1/3 wall height. The retaining wall-EPS composite soil system is shown to have a better seismic performance in contrast to WSS. The Seed and Whitman method with 100% PGA is recommended to predict the dynamic earth thrust on the wall retaining EPS composite soil.
引用
收藏
页码:5481 / 5510
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shaking table tests on the seismic performance of a flexible wall retaining EPS composite soil
    Hongmei Gao
    Ying Hu
    Zhihua Wang
    Chao Wang
    Guoxing Chen
    [J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 15 : 5481 - 5510
  • [2] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF EPS COMPOSITE SOIL FOUNDATION-CAISSON USING SHAKING TABLE MODEL TESTS
    Gao, Hong-Mei
    Zhang, Shu-Shan
    Cai, Xin-Tao
    Zhang, Xin-Lei
    Wang, Zhi-Hua
    Sun, Jin-Jing
    Li, Bing
    [J]. Gongcheng Lixue/Engineering Mechanics, 2024, 41 (05): : 192 - 200
  • [3] Shaking table tests on seismic earth pressure exerted on retaining wall model
    Watanabe, K
    Kobayashi, Y
    Towhata, I
    Maeda, T
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 1999, : 297 - 302
  • [4] Seismic Earth Pressures of Retaining Wall from Large Shaking Table Tests
    Yang, Changwei
    Zhang, Jian Jing
    Qu Honglue
    Bi Junwei
    Liu Feicheng
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [5] Irregular shaking table tests on seismic stability of reinforced-soil retaining walls
    Watanabe, K
    Tateyama, M
    Kojima, K
    Koseki, J
    [J]. LANDMARKS IN EARTH REINFORCEMENT, VOL 1, 2001, : 489 - 494
  • [6] Shaking Table Study on the Seismic Performance of Geogrid Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls
    Cai, Xiaoguang
    Li, Sihan
    Xu, Honglu
    Jing, Liping
    Huang, Xin
    Zhu, Chen
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [7] Numerical modeling of EPS seismic buffer shaking table tests
    Zarnani, Saman
    Bathurst, Richard J.
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2008, 26 (05) : 371 - 383
  • [8] Seismic response of wrap-faced reinforced soil-retaining wall models using shaking table tests
    Krishna, A. Murali
    Latha, G. Madhavi
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 14 (06) : 355 - 364
  • [9] Shaking table model tests on geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall with embedded sheetpile
    Nakajima, S.
    Koseki, J.
    Watanabe, K.
    Tateyama, M.
    Kato, N.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS, VOLS 1-4, 2006, : 1507 - +
  • [10] Evaluation of the effects of EPS composite soil replacement on the dynamic performance of caisson structure using shaking table tests
    Gao Hongmei
    Ji Zhanpeng
    Zhang Xinlei
    Zhang Shushan
    Wang Zhihua
    Shen Guangming
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024, 23 (04) - 843