The Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ Dysfunction (PIRO) Scoring System in Predicting Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Septic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Atef, Ahmed [1 ]
Hamela, Mohamed Abo [1 ]
Khaled, Mahmoud [1 ]
Hussein, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Crit Care Med Dept, Cairo, Egypt
来源
关键词
APACHE II score; mortality; PIRO score; sepsis; SOFA score; SEVERE SEPSIS; DEFINITIONS; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1097/EJ9.0000000000000017
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: The predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction (PIRO) staging system was a stratification tool for septic patients. We aimed at assessment of the predictive performance of PIRO score for the development of multiple organ dysfunction, 28-days mortality in sepsis in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, duration of ICU stay, and ICU readmission within 28 days. Also, to compare PIRO score with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Methods: Fifty adult patients diagnosed as having systemic sepsis and admitted to ICU were enrolled in the study. PIRO, SOFA, and APACHE II scores were calculated for each patient on the first, second, and third day of admission. Patients were followed up for 28 days. Patients were classified as survivors and non-survivors. Results: Twenty-eight patients died, while 22 patients survived till hospital discharge. Three patients readmitted to ICU. The survivors stayed shorter than the non-survivors, (14.9 +/- 7.5) versus (20.1 +/- 7.3) days, respectively. In comparison between survivors and non-survivors, APACHE II score was significantly lower in survivors in the second and third days (P= .038 and P= .046, respectively), in survivors PIRO score was significantly lower in second day (P= .039), SOFA score was significantly lower in the first, second, and third days (P value .002, <.002, and <0.003, respectively) and serum lactate was also significantly lower in the first, second, and third days (P value .026, .019, and .030), respectively. Conclusions: APACHE II, PIRO, SOFA scores, and serum lactate were valuable tools in predicting 28-day mortality in patients diagnosed as having sepsis.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 72
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk stratification and prognostic performance of the predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction (PIRO) scoring system in septic patients in the emergency department: a cohort study
    Chen, Yun-Xia
    Li, Chun-Sheng
    CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 18 (02)
  • [2] Risk stratification and prognostic performance of the predisposition, infection, response, and organ dysfunction (PIRO) scoring system in septic patients in the emergency department: a cohort study
    Yun-Xia Chen
    Chun-Sheng Li
    Critical Care, 18
  • [3] Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response and Organ Dysfunction (PIRO): A Pilot Clinical Staging System for Hospital Mortality in Patients with Infection
    Cardoso, Teresa
    Teixeira-Pinto, Armando
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Aragao, Irene
    Costa-Pereira, Altamiro
    Sarmento, Antonio E.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (07):
  • [4] Predictive Value of Combination of Procalcitonin and Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ Dysfunction (PIRO) System in Septic Patients with Positive Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department
    Yang, Long
    Lin, Yue
    Zhang, Xiangqun
    Wei, Bing
    Wang, Junyu
    Liu, Bo
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2022, 15 : 6189 - 6202
  • [5] Validation of the Predisposition Infection Response Organ (PIRO) dysfunction score for the prognostic stratification of patients with sepsis in the Emergency Department
    Caramello, V
    Macciotta, A.
    Beux, V
    De Salve, A., V
    Ricceri, F.
    Boccuzzi, A.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2021, 45 (08) : 459 - 469
  • [6] The PIRO (predisposition, insult, response, organ dysfunction) model Toward a staging system for acute illness
    Marshall, John C.
    VIRULENCE, 2014, 5 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [7] Comparison of three models for sepsis patient discrimination according to PIRO: predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction
    Tafelski, S.
    Nachtigall, I.
    Stengel, S.
    Wernecke, K.
    Spies, C.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2015, 81 (03) : 264 - 271
  • [8] Prospective international validation of the predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction (PIRO) clinical staging system among intensive care and general ward patients
    Cardoso, T.
    Rodrigues, P. P.
    Nunes, C.
    Almeida, M.
    Cancela, J.
    Rosa, F.
    Rocha-Pereira, N.
    Ferreira, I.
    Seabra-Pereira, F.
    Vaz, P.
    Carneiro, L.
    Andrade, C.
    Davis, J.
    Marcal, A.
    Friedman, N. D.
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [9] Prospective international validation of the predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction (PIRO) clinical staging system among intensive care and general ward patients
    T. Cardoso
    P. P. Rodrigues
    C. Nunes
    M. Almeida
    J. Cancela
    F. Rosa
    N. Rocha-Pereira
    I. Ferreira
    F. Seabra-Pereira
    P. Vaz
    L. Carneiro
    C. Andrade
    J. Davis
    A. Marçal
    N. D. Friedman
    Annals of Intensive Care, 11