Rush venom immunotherapy in patients experiencing recurrent systemic reactions to conventional venom immunotherapy

被引:37
|
作者
Goldberg, A [1 ]
Confino-Cohen, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Meir Hosp, Allergy & Clin Immunol Unit, IL-44281 Kefar Sava, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61689-4
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: An unknown number of venom-allergic patients fail to reach the maintenance dose (MD) during the build-up period of conventional venom immunotherapy (VIT) due to recurrent systemic reactions (SRs). Objective: To establish an alternative VIT protocol that will enable these patients to reach a full protective MD. Methods: Venom-allergic patients who had experienced recurrent SRs during the build-up period of conventional VIT underwent rush VIT. Results: Of the 9 patients who participated in this study, the 6 who underwent 8 treatment courses tolerated the rush VIT well and reached the MD within 3 days. In 3 of these patients, mild cutaneous SRs were overcome with loratadine. In 2 patients who experienced recurrent and more severe SRs, the original 3-day rush VIT had to be modified and extended to 5 days until the MD was reached. In a single patient who experienced an anaphylactic reaction, VIT was discontinued. Conclusions: Rush VIT is an appropriate therapeutic alternative that enables most patients with recurrent SRs throughout the build-up period of conventional VIT to reach a full protective MD.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 410
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultrarush venom desensitisation after systemic reactions during conventional venom immunotherapy
    Patella, V
    Florio, G.
    Giuliano, A.
    Oricchio, C.
    ALLERGY, 2013, 68 : 495 - 496
  • [2] Ultrarush venom desensitization after systemic reactions during conventional venom immunotherapy
    Oren, Eyal
    Chegini, Soheil
    Hamilos, Daniel L.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 97 (05) : 606 - 610
  • [3] VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY - COMPARISON OF RUSH VS CONVENTIONAL SCHEDULES
    GILLMAN, SA
    CUMMINS, LH
    KOZAK, PP
    HOFFMAN, DR
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY, 1980, 45 (06): : 351 - 354
  • [4] SYSTEMIC REACTIONS TO HYMENOPTERA VENOM IMMUNOTHERAPY
    YOULTEN, LJF
    ATKINSON, B
    LEE, TH
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1994, 24 (02): : 189 - 189
  • [5] Adverse reactions in venom immunotherapy protocols: conventional versus ultra-rush
    Selcuk, Ali
    Baysan, Abdullah
    Yesillik, Sait
    Demirel, Fevzi
    Kartal, Ozgur
    Gulec, Mustafa
    Musabak, Ugur
    Sener, Osman
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 2022, 54 (01) : 2321 - 2325
  • [6] Venom immunotherapy What is the rush?
    Golden, David B. K.
    Tracy, James M.
    ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 133 (04) : 360 - 361
  • [7] Rush Venom Immunotherapy in Children
    Confino-Cohen, Ronit
    Rosman, Yossi
    Goldberg, Arnon
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2017, 5 (03): : 799 - 803
  • [8] Rush venom immunotherapy in patient with previous anaphylaxis during venom immunotherapy.
    Fischer, DA
    Payton, KB
    Butchey, JRK
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1996, 97 (01) : 624 - 624
  • [9] Safety of Hymenoptera venom rush immunotherapy
    Laurent, J
    Smiejan, JM
    BlochMorot, E
    Herman, D
    ALLERGY, 1997, 52 (01) : 94 - 96
  • [10] Safety of rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy
    Brockow, K
    Ring, J
    ALLERGY, 2004, 59 (11) : 1233 - 1233