Functional electrical stimulation has many theoretical advantages. In clinical practice, very favorable results have been repeatedly presented. The experience now encompasses thirty years and a very large number of incontinent patients. Although the methods are widely used, they are differently appreciated. Problems include the fact that functional electrical stimulation does not belong to the therapeutic traditions in urology and gynecology, there is a need of personal training for successful treatment and there is a lack of systematic studies on different clinical applications. Significant advantages are a rational physiological basis, applicability in a variety of lower urinary tract dysfunctions, few side effects and a potential curative effect.