It Wasn't Me! Repudiability and Claimability of Ring Signatures

被引:14
|
作者
Park, Sunoo [1 ]
Sealfon, Adam [2 ]
机构
[1] MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA USA
[2] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-26954-8_6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Ring signatures, introduced by [RST01], are a variant of digital signatures which certify that one among a particular set of parties has endorsed a message while hiding which party in the set was the signer. Ring signatures are designed to allow anyone to attach anyone else's name to a signature, as long as the signer's own name is also attached. But what guarantee do ring signatures provide if a purported signatory wishes to denounce a signed message-or alternatively, if a signatory wishes to later come forward and claim ownership of a signature? Prior security definitions for ring signatures do not give a conclusive answer to this question: under most existing definitions, the guarantees could go either way. That is, it is consistent with some standard definitions that a non-signer might be able to repudiate a signature that he did not produce, or that this might be impossible. Similarly, a signer might be able to later convincingly claim that a signature he produced is indeed his own, or not. Any of these guarantees might be desirable. For instance, a whistleblower might have reason to want to later claim an anonymously released signature, or a person falsely implicated in a crime associated with a ring signature might wish to denounce the signature that is framing them and damaging their reputation. In other circumstances, it might be desirable that even under duress, a member of a ring cannot produce proof that he did or did not sign a particular signature. In any case, a guarantee one way or the other seems highly desirable. In this work, we formalize definitions and give constructions of the new notions of repudiable, unrepudiable, claimable, and unclaimable ring signatures. Our repudiable construction is based on VRFs, which are implied by several number-theoretic assumptions (including strong RSA or bilinear maps); our claimable construction is a black-box transformation from any standard ring signature scheme to a claimable one; and our unclaimable construction is derived from the lattice-based ring signatures of [BK10], which rely on hardness of SIS. Our repudiable construction also provides a new construction of standard ring signatures.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 190
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] It wasn't me
    Campbell, Virginia
    [J]. TPM-THE PHILOSOPHERS MAGAZINE, 2006, (34): : 94 - 94
  • [2] IT WASN'T ME, IT WAS MY BRAIN
    Thomson, Helen
    [J]. NEW SCIENTIST, 2013, 218 (2921) : 10 - 10
  • [3] 'Excuse me, this wasn't part of my birthplan!'
    Cordell, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2000, 44 : 246 - 246
  • [4] IT WASN'T ME: IRREGULAR IDENTITY IN DEEPFAKE VIDEOS
    Liu, Honggu
    Bestagini, Paolo
    Huang, Lin
    Zhou, Wenbo
    Tubaro, Stefano
    Zhang, Weiming
    Yu, Nenghai
    [J]. 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP, 2023, : 2770 - 2774
  • [5] Count Me In! Extendability for Threshold Ring Signatures
    Aranha, Diego F.
    Hall-Andersen, Mathias
    Nitulescu, Anca
    Pagnin, Elena
    Yakoubov, Sophia
    [J]. PUBLIC-KEY CRYPTOGRAPHY, PKC 2022, PT II, 2022, 13178 : 379 - 406
  • [6] It Wasn't Me-Unintended Targets of Arrest Warrants
    Stracener, Brandon V.
    [J]. CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 2017, 105 (01) : 229 - 261
  • [7] It Wasn't Me! Visibility and Free Riding in Waste Disposal
    Bucciol, Alessandro
    Montinari, Natalia
    Piovesan, Marco
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 157 : 394 - 401
  • [8] POST-INTUBATION TRACHEAL RUPTURE: WASN'T ME
    Kregor, Alexandria Clarke
    Deleveaux, Spencer
    Perez, Hector Roman
    Fuentes, Xavier Fonseca
    Mekhaiel, Essam
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 416 - 416
  • [9] Piltdown wasn't cricket but does the hobbit ring true?
    Simon L. Goodman
    [J]. Nature, 2006, 443 : 394 - 394
  • [10] Piltdown wasn't cricket but does the hobbit ring true?
    Goodman, Simon L.
    [J]. NATURE, 2006, 443 (7110) : 394 - 394