UO2 and MOX fuel behaviour in long term dry storage

被引:0
|
作者
Goll, W
Fuchs, HP
Leger, AC
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Germany's new energy act, dated 2002, stipulates prohibition of reprocessing as of 1 July 2005 and nuclear waste disposal restricted to a final repository. To avoid large-scale transportation, nuclear plant operators shall construct on-site storage facilities, mainly for dry cask storage, to keep spent fuel assemblies until a final repository is available. This paper deals with cladding integrity assessment, which is usually assessed by means of creep laws and rupture criteria. A stress limit of 120 MPa and a maximum strain of 1% are used in Germany to avoid systematic cladding degradation. The strain calculations are based on a creep formula of non-irradiated fast creeping cladding, whereas the straining capability is derived from similar irradiated material. The straining capability was originally determined by short-time creep-burst experiments on high burnup PWR fuel rods with commercial Zry cladding. The experiments revealed a high straining capability of about 2% and no degradation with regard to increased oxide thickness and hydrogen content of the cladding. The straining capability has been also evaluated for M5 cladding by creep tests on irradiated material and strains of at least 1% without defect are guaranteed for a large range of temperatures. Future fuel cycle developments are featured by an even higher discharge burnup and intensified use of MOX fuel. As a result, rod inner pressures and storage temperatures will increase and a considerable percentage of rods will exceed the 1%-strain limit if calculated by creep laws based on non-irradiated material. To cope with this more demanding situation, unnecessary conservatism has to be replaced by a more realistic methodology. Extensive programmes are in progress on commercial materials in order to derive more predictive creep laws and rupture criteria for irradiated cladding.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behaviour of MOX fuel as compared to UO2 fuel
    Guérin, Y
    Lespiaux, D
    Struzik, C
    Caillot, L
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE WORKSHOP ON THE PHYSICS AND FUEL PERFORMANCE OF REACTOR-BASED PLUTONIUM DISPOSITION, 1999, : 151 - 157
  • [2] Helium behaviour in spent UO2 and MOX fuels
    Piron, JP
    Pelletier, M
    Pavageau, J
    FISSION GAS BEHAVIOUR IN WATER REACTOR FUELS, SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 311 - 320
  • [3] Safety and neutronics:: A comparison of MOX vs UO2 fuel
    Trellue, HR
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2006, 48 (02) : 135 - 145
  • [4] Influence of low temperature air oxidation on the dissolution behaviour of UO2 and MOX spent fuel
    Serrano, JA
    Glatz, JP
    Toscano, EH
    Papaioannou, D
    Barrero, J
    Coquerelle, M
    JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS, 1998, 271 : 573 - 576
  • [5] Influence of low temperature air oxidation on the dissolution behaviour of UO2 and MOX spent fuel
    Departamento de Fision Nuclear, Madrid, Spain
    J Alloys Compd, (573-576):
  • [6] FUEL PERFORMANCE CODE COSMOS FOR ANALYSIS OF LWR UO2 AND MOX FUEL
    Lee, Byung-Ho
    Koo, Yang-Hyun
    Oh, Jae-Yong
    Cheon, Jin-Sik
    Tahk, Young-Wook
    Sohn, Dong-Seong
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 43 (06) : 499 - 508
  • [7] SGMP - AN ADVANCED METHOD FOR FABRICATION OF UO2 AND MOX FUEL PELLETS
    ZIMMER, E
    GANGULY, C
    BORCHARDT, J
    LANGEN, H
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1988, 152 (2-3) : 169 - 177
  • [8] A Comparative Study on the Safety and Kinetic Parameters of UO2 and MOX Fuel
    Hassan, Mohga
    ARAB JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS, 2016, 49 (01): : 53 - 60
  • [9] A mechanistic fission gas behaviour model for UO2 and MOX fuels
    Noirot, L
    Garcia, P
    Struzik, C
    FISSION GAS BEHAVIOUR IN WATER REACTOR FUELS, SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 131 - 149
  • [10] A comparative study of fission gas behaviour in UO2 and MOX fuels using the meteor fuel performance code
    Struzik, C
    Garcia, P
    Noirot, L
    FISSION GAS BEHAVIOUR IN WATER REACTOR FUELS, SEMINAR PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 511 - 522