Risk assessment in animal welfare - Especially referring to animal transport

被引:32
|
作者
Marahrens, M. [1 ]
Kleinschmidt, N. [1 ]
Di Nardo, A. [2 ]
Velarde, A. [3 ]
Fuentes, C. [3 ]
Truar, A. [1 ]
Otero, J. L. [3 ]
Di Fede, E. [2 ]
Dalla Villa, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Inst Anim Welf & Anim Husb, D-29223 Celle, Germany
[2] Ist G Caporale Teramo, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
[3] IRTA, Anim Welf Subprogram, Girona 17121, Spain
关键词
Animal welfare; Risk assessment; Animal transport; Guidelines;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.04.010
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The increasing awareness of animal welfare in public and science induces a need for objective evaluation. Particularly animal welfare during transport is discussed due to the variable transport conditions in Europe. Therefore an objective evaluation of animal transport is relevant and the first attempts to develop animal welfare risk assessment guidelines for animal transport are made. A report of the development of a guideline on animal welfare risk assessment during animal transport (Dalla Villa et al., 2009) bases on other recent reports and guidelines of animal welfare risk assessment published by EFSA (2009) and adapts the method to animal transport condition. For the implementation of a model for quantitative risk assessment, transport conditions were defined to develop multiple scenarios. Hazard identification was prepared for each scenario and for three selected scenarios a complete risk assessment was performed. Within the exemplary risk assessment potential hazards were initially identified and furthermore hazard description and exposure assessment were evaluated by expert opinion which resulted in risk characterisation. Within risk characterisation of each hazard, magnitude and risk estimate were calculated to afford an individual ranking of these values in order to obtain a graphical illustration of the ten highest estimated risks. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 163
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Guidance on Risk Assessment for Animal Welfare
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Joerg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (01)
  • [2] Risk assessment principles in evaluation of animal welfare
    Paton, M. W.
    Martin, P. A. J.
    Fisher, A. D.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2013, 22 (02) : 277 - 285
  • [3] An Animal Welfare Risk Assessment Process for Zoos
    Sherwen, Sally L.
    Hemsworth, Lauren M.
    Beausoleil, Ngaio J.
    Embury, Amanda
    Mellor, David J.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (08):
  • [4] Animal welfare - Government reviews animal welfare during transport
    不详
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1999, 145 (09) : 238 - 238
  • [5] Animal Welfare Calves are particularly at Risk during Transport
    不详
    [J]. FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, 2021, 101 (04): : 29 - 29
  • [6] The Animal Welfare Assessment Contest® as a Tool to Promote Animal Welfare Education
    Kuca, Sharon
    McKinney, Lindsey
    Johnson, Cia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 468 - 468
  • [7] ANIMAL RIGHTS ANIMAL-WELFARE - A SCIENTISTS ASSESSMENT
    DUNCAN, IJH
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 1981, 60 (03) : 489 - 499
  • [8] Animal welfare assessment and auditing
    Curtis, S. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 595 - 595
  • [9] Neurophysiological assessment of animal welfare
    Tilbrook, A. J.
    Ralph, C. R.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2017, 57 (12) : 2370 - 2375
  • [10] Animal welfare assessment and auditing
    Curtis, S. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 : 595 - 595