A review on exergy comparison of hydrogen production methods from renewable energy sources

被引:333
|
作者
Christopher, Koroneos [1 ]
Dimitrios, Rovas [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Lab Heat Transfer & Environm Engn, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POWER-SYSTEM; WATER; ELECTROLYSIS;
D O I
10.1039/c2ee01098d
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Hydrogen is an important energy carrier which could play a very significant role in the reduction of emissions of greenhouse gases. The route by which hydrogen is produced is the determining factor for its environmental performance. Hydrogen can be produced through methane reforming or through the electrolysis of water with the use of electricity or it can be produced directly by gasification from biomass. Renewable energy sources (RES) could be the feedstock for the two methods previously mentioned. The objective of this work is the comparison of hydrogen (H-2) production processes using various renewable energy sources. This comparison is based on the exergy efficiency of each process. The renewable energy sources that have been used are: wind power, solar energy, hydroelectric power, and biomass. The solar energy systems that are used are photovoltaic and thermal. The biomass systems are divided into two categories: (a) electricity production through biomass combustion, (b) biomass gasification for the direct production of hydrogen. When in any of the processes electricity is produced, this electricity is used for the electrolysis process of water to produce hydrogen (and oxygen). Because hydrogen is transported in a liquid form, the liquefaction process is also taken into consideration in this work. The liquefaction process is very energy intensive and as a consequence it requires a lot of exergy. It has been found that the hydrogen production process with the highest exergy efficiency is the electrolysis using electricity from hydro power. This efficiency is 5.6%. The process with the lowest exergy efficiency is the one with electrolysis driven by electricity from solar energy photovoltaics. The efficiency of this process is 1.0%.
引用
收藏
页码:6640 / 6651
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hydrogen production from renewable energy sources
    Bastien, Julie
    Handler, Cynthia
    [J]. 2006 IEEE EIC CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 446 - 454
  • [2] HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION FROM RENEWABLE SOURCES OF ENERGY
    LODHI, MAK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1987, 12 (07) : 461 - 468
  • [3] Membrane reactors for hydrogen production from renewable energy sources
    Gapp, Ellen
    Pfeifer, Peter
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GREEN AND SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY, 2023, 41
  • [4] PEM electrolysis for production of hydrogen from renewable energy sources
    Barbir, F
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2005, 78 (05) : 661 - 669
  • [5] Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production from renewable energy sources
    Jensen, Soren H.
    Larsen, Peter H.
    Mogensen, Mogens
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (15) : 3253 - 3257
  • [6] Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated renewable energy system for hydrogen production
    Qureshy, Ali M. M. I.
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. ENERGY, 2020, 204
  • [7] Comparative assessment of hydrogen production methods from renewable and non-renewable sources
    Acar, Canan
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2014, 39 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [8] Exergy analysis of renewable energy sources
    Koroneos, C
    Spachos, T
    Moussiopoulos, N
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2003, 28 (02) : 295 - 310
  • [9] Production Cost of Hydrogen from Electrolysis Driven by Renewable Energy Sources
    TochaCkova, Anna
    Laciok, Ales
    Silhan, Martin
    [J]. CHEMICKE LISTY, 2021, 115 (11): : 623 - 627
  • [10] Approaches for integrated hydrogen production based on nuclear and renewable energy sources: Energy and exergy assessments of nuclear and solar energy sources in the United Arab Emirates
    Orhan, Mehmet F.
    Kahraman, Huseyin
    Babu, Binish S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (04) : 2601 - 2616