Sports Economics for Non-Economists

被引:0
|
作者
Dabscheck, Braham [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1475-4932.12696
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 321
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Teaching introductory economics for non-economists: panoramic key content
    Lastra B, Rosalia S.
    Guadalupe Galvan, Ma
    Ibarra M, Luis Jesus
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION - INTE 2012, 2012, 55 : 1159 - 1167
  • [2] Incorporating the advantages of clickers and mobile devices to teach Economics to non-economists
    Mu, Hairong
    Paparas, Dimitrios
    [J]. COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2015, 3 (01):
  • [3] VALUE OF COLLEGE - NON-ECONOMISTS VIEW
    HOWE, H
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RECORD, 1976, 57 (01): : 5 - 12
  • [4] OPTIONS FOR REDUCING INPUTS TO AGRICULTURE - A NON-ECONOMISTS VIEW
    RAYMOND, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1985, 36 (03) : 345 - 354
  • [5] Business competencies of non-economists students in conditions of Slovakian universities
    Culkova, Katarina
    Hrehova, Daniela
    Janoskova, Maria
    [J]. POPRAD ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT FORUM 2017, 2017, : 150 - 161
  • [6] A resource economic perspective om erosion control for non-economists
    Hitzhusen, FJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL EROSION CONTROL ASSOCIATION - PROCEEDINGS OF CONFERENCE 30, 1999, 30 : 99 - +
  • [8] Scientists' view s on economic growth versus the environment: a questionnaire survey among economists and non-economists
    Drews, Stefan
    van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2017, 46 : 88 - 103
  • [9] RESEARCH AND SOCIETY .4. COST-BENEFIT ISSUES AS SEEN BY NON-ECONOMISTS
    SERAFETINIDES, EA
    COHEN, J
    MAY, PRA
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1986, 74 : 34 - 39
  • [10] Economic education as a driver of private provision?: Empirical evidence on “Financial Literacy” and the attitude towards private provision of economists vs. non-economists
    Kramer B.
    Ruske R.
    [J]. List Forum für Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik, 2016, 41 (3) : 325 - 348