Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions

被引：80
|
作者：
Okdie, Bradley M. [1 ]
Guadagno, Rosanna E. [1 ]
Bernieri, Frank J. [2 ]
Geers, Andrew L. [3 ]
Mclarney-Vesotski, Amber R. [4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Psychol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Psychol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[3] Univ Toledo, Dept Psychol, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
[4] Alpena Community Coll, Alpena, MI 49707 USA
来源：
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR | 2011年 / 27卷 / 01期
关键词：
Computer-mediated communication; Person perception; Personality; Self-other agreement; Impression formation; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; IMPRESSION-FORMATION; THIN SLICES; PERCEPTION; SELF; PERSONALITY; ACCURACY; INTERNET; PERSUASION; BEHAVIOR;
D O I：
10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.017
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
It is an open question as to how impressions formed via computer-mediated communication (CMC) differ from those formed face-to-face (FtF). Some research suggests that judgments of others formed while interacting over CMC are more favorable than judgments formed in FtF, while other researchers argue the pattern is in the opposite direction. We sought to settle this conflict by examining impressions formed via each communication mode while controlling for the other. Participants interacted with a partner twice: once FtF and once CMC. When controlling for each communication mode, participants interacting FtF, formed more positive impressions of their partner than did those in the other sequence. Furthermore, FtF participants had greater self-other agreement then those who interacted via CMC. Implications for impressions formed over the Internet are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：153 / 159
页数：7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE INTERACTIONS - IS A TASK A TASK?
    Duensing, Annette
    Stickler, Ursula
    Batstone, Carolyn
    Heins, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING DESIGN, 2006, 1 (02): : 35 - 45
  • [2] AN EXAMINATION OF THE INTERACTIONS IN FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE TUTORIALS
    Eleftheriou, M.
    Ahmed, F.
    7TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2013), 2013,
  • [3] Thwarted Belongingness in Relation to Face-to-Face and Online Interactions
    Ringer, Fallon B.
    Anestis, Michael D.
    SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2018, 48 (04) : 468 - 480
  • [4] Online versus face-to-face peer team reviews
    Figl, Kathrin
    Bauer, Christine
    Mangler, Jurgen
    Motschnig, Renate
    36TH ANNUAL FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, CONFERENCE PROGRAM, VOLS 1-4: BORDERS: INTERNATIONAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL, 2006, : 808 - +
  • [5] You do not know what you have until it is gone: The importance of face-to-face interactions in local economic development
    Sutton, Jesse
    Arku, Godwin
    Sadler, Richard
    COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 54 (05) : 683 - 700
  • [6] Students' Perception of Online Versus Face-to-Face Learning: What Do the Healthcare Teachers Have to Know?
    Siddiqui, Ammar Ahmed
    Ul Abideen, Malik Zain
    Fatima, Saman
    Khan, Muhammad Talal
    Gillani, Syed W.
    Alrefai, Zeyad A.
    Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
    Rathore, Hassaan A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [7] Employer Perceptions of Online Versus Face-to-Face Degree Programs
    Roberto, Katherine J.
    Johnson, Andrew F.
    JOURNAL OF EMPLOYMENT COUNSELING, 2019, 56 (04) : 180 - 189
  • [8] Feedback as a Powerful Teaching Tool: Online Versus Face-to-Face
    Nistor, Cristina Mihaela
    Comanetchi, Doina
    NEW TECHNOLOGIES AND REDESIGNING LEARNING SPACES, VOL II, 2019, : 110 - 115
  • [9] The psychodermatology diploma: comparing the online versus the face-to-face experience
    Poot, F.
    Sampogna, F.
    Tomas-Aragones, L.
    Gieler, U.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 185 (03) : E86 - E86
  • [10] Face-to-face versus online tutoring support in distance education
    Price, Linda
    Richardson, John T. E.
    Jelfs, Anne
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2007, 32 (01) : 1 - 20
12345