Postoperative circulating tumour DNA is associated with pathologic response and recurrence-free survival after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases

被引:25
|
作者
Bolhuis, Karen [1 ]
van 't Erve, Iris [2 ]
Mijnals, Clinton [3 ]
Delis-Van Diemen, Pien M. [2 ]
Huiskens, Joost [4 ]
Komurcu, Aysun [5 ]
Lopez-Yurda, Marta [6 ]
van den Broek, Daan [7 ]
Swijnenburg, Rutger-Jan [8 ]
Meijer, Gerrit A. [2 ]
Punt, Cornelis J. A. [1 ,9 ]
Fijneman, Remond J. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Pathol, Plesmanlaan 121, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Amphia Hosp, Dept Pathol, Breda, Netherlands
[4] SAS Inst BV, Huizen, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Netherlands Canc Inst, Biometr Dept, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[7] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Clin Chem, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Univ Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Univ Med Ctr, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
EBIOMEDICINE | 2021年 / 70卷
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Liver metastases; Circulating tumour DNA; Resection; Recurrences; HEPATIC RESECTION; PREDICTIVE-VALUE; CHEMOTHERAPY; HEPATECTOMY; MUTATIONS; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103498
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Recurrence rates after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) are high and correlate with worse survival. Postoperative circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker. Focusing on patients with resected CRLM, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the detection of postoperative ctDNA, pathologic response and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Methods: Twenty-three patients were selected from an ongoing phase-3 trial who underwent resection of RAS-mutant CRLM after induction systemic treatment. CtDNA analysis was performed by droplet digital PCR using blood samples collected at baseline, before and after resection. Pathologic response of CRLM was determined via the Tumour Regression Grading system. Findings: With a median follow-up of 19.6 months, the median RFS for patients with detectable (N = 6, [26%]) and undetectable (N = 17, [74%]) postoperative ctDNA was 4.8 versus 12.1 months, respectively. Among 21 patients with available tumour tissue, pathologic response in patients with detectable compared to undetectable postoperative ctDNA was found in one of six (17%) and 15 of 15 (100%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In univariable Cox regression analyses both postoperative detectable ctDNA (HR = 3.3, 95%CI = 1.1-9.6, p = 0.03) and pathologic non-response (HR = 4.6, 95%CI = 1.4-15, p = 0.01) were associated with poorer RFS and were strongly correlated (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). After adjusting for clinical characteristics in pairwise multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status remained associated with RFS. Interpretation: The detection of postoperative ctDNA after secondary resection of CRLM is a promising prognostic factor for RFS and appeared to be highly correlated with pathologic response. Funding: None (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resection Margin and Recurrence-Free Survival After Liver Resection of Colorectal Metastases
    Andrea Muratore
    Dario Ribero
    Giuseppe Zimmitti
    Alfredo Mellano
    Serena Langella
    Lorenzo Capussotti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2010, 17 : 1324 - 1329
  • [2] Resection Margin and Recurrence-Free Survival After Liver Resection of Colorectal Metastases
    Muratore, Andrea
    Ribero, Dario
    Zimmitti, Giuseppe
    Mellano, Alfredo
    Langella, Serena
    Capussotti, Lorenzo
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 1324 - 1329
  • [3] Recurrence-free survival versus overall survival as a primary endpoint after resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Fritsch, J.
    Ardelt, M.
    Settmacher, U.
    CHIRURGIE, 2023, 94 (03): : 272 - 273
  • [4] Effect of tumour size ratio on liver recurrence-free survival of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Zhai, Yana
    Bai, Weijun
    Zhou, Jin
    Dong, Qian
    Zhang, Jingdong
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] Effect of tumour size ratio on liver recurrence-free survival of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Yana Zhai
    Weijun Bai
    Jin Zhou
    Qian Dong
    Jingdong Zhang
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [6] Association of postoperative circulating tumor DNA with early recurrence after resection for colorectal liver metastases
    Yokoyama, Yasuyuki
    Yamada, Takeshi
    Uehara, Kay
    Matsuda, Akihisa
    Shinji, Seiichi
    Takahashi, Goro
    Iwai, Takuma
    Miyasaka, Toshimitsu
    Kanaka, Shintaro
    Matsui, Takanori
    Yoshida, Hiroshi
    CANCER SCIENCE, 2025, 116 : 1724 - 1724
  • [7] Liver-First Resection in Patients With Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases Is Associated With Inferior Recurrence-Free Survival: Reconsidering the Importance of the Primary Cancer
    Sutton, Thomas
    Patel, Ranish
    Watson, Katherine
    Gardner, Ivy
    Herzig, Daniel
    Tsikitis, V.
    Chen, Emerson
    Mayo, Skye
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2025, 68 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [8] Histologically Verified Biliary Invasion was Associated with Impaired Liver Recurrence-Free Survival in Resected Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
    Reijonen, P.
    Osterlund, P.
    Isoniemi, H.
    Arola, J.
    Nordin, A.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 108 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [9] Long-term recurrence-free survival after hepatic resection for metachronous gastric cancer liver metastases
    Peeters, Bert
    Kerstens, Jeroen
    Specenier, Pol
    TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (04) : 497 - 499
  • [10] Prognostic value of circulating tumour cells for early recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Z S Lalmahomed
    B Mostert
    W Onstenk
    J Kraan
    N Ayez
    J W Gratama
    D Grünhagen
    C Verhoef
    S Sleijfer
    British Journal of Cancer, 2015, 112 : 556 - 561