Species comparison of the physical properties of loblolly and slash pine wood and bark

被引:7
|
作者
Eberhardt, Thomas L. [1 ]
Dahlen, Joseph [2 ]
Schimleck, Laurence [3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, Forest Prod Lab, One Gifford Pinchot Dr, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, 180 E Green St, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Oregon State Univ, Wood Sci & Engn, 119 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
bark thickness; moisture content; specific gravity; wood quality; yield; LOB LOLLY PINE; LONGLEAF PINE; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; GROWTH EFFICIENCY; WEED-CONTROL; LEAF-AREA; TREE; FERTILIZATION; PRODUCTIVITY; PLANTATIONS;
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-2017-0091
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Composition of the southern pine forest is now predominated by two species, loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.), owing to fire suppression activities, natural regeneration on abandoned agricultural lands, and extensive planting. Comparison of the wood and bark physical properties of these pines is of interest in terms of the yields of usable biomass and, for the bark, its ecological functionality on a living tree. Trees from a species comparison study were used to generate wood and bark property data, on a whole-tree basis, and for stem disks collected at breast height. Models were constructed to explain the effect of relative height on wood and bark properties. When comparing the whole-tree data, slash pine wood (0.523 versus 0.498) and bark (0.368 versus 0.311) specific gravity values were higher, both offset by lower moisture contents; slash pine also produced a higher percentage of bark on a dry-mass basis (17% versus 12.5%). Unlike wood properties, bark properties showed significant between-species differences when determined at breast height alone, the exception being moisture content. In terms of yield, harvests of a green tonne of loblolly pine and slash pine would give approximately the same dry mass of wood, but slash pine provides more bark.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1505
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical and Mechanical Properties of Loblolly and Slash Pine Wood from Uruguayan Plantations
    Moya, Laura
    Laguarda, Maria F.
    Cagno, Matias
    Cardoso, Andrea
    Gatto, Francisco
    O'Neill, Hugo
    FOREST PRODUCTS JOURNAL, 2013, 63 (3-4) : 128 - 137
  • [2] VARIATIONS OF LOBLOLLY AND SLASH PINE BARK EXTRACTIVE COMPONENTS AND WOOD TURPENTINE COMPONENTS ON A MONTHLY BASIS
    PEARL, IA
    TAPPI, 1975, 58 (10): : 146 - 149
  • [3] SLASH LOBLOLLY AND LONGLEAF PINE IN A MIXED NATURAL STAND - A COMPARISON OF THEIR WOOD PROPERTIES PULP YIELDS AND PAPER PROPERTIES
    COLE, DE
    ZOBEL, BJ
    ROBERDS, JH
    TAPPI, 1966, 49 (04): : 161 - &
  • [4] Wood quality of intensively cultivated slash and loblolly pine
    Faust, TD
    Clark, A
    Shiver, BD
    1997 PULPING CONFERENCE, BOOKS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 781 - 790
  • [5] Substituting Pine Wood for Pine Bark Affects Physical Properties of Nursery Substrates
    Altland, James E.
    Krause, Charles R.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2012, 47 (10) : 1499 - 1503
  • [6] Influence of White Wood on Physical Properties of Pine Bark Substrates
    Jackson, Brian
    Fonteno, William
    Wunch, Abigail
    HORTSCIENCE, 2015, 50 (09) : S365 - S366
  • [7] STIMULATION OF RESIN FLOW IN SLASH AND LOBLOLLY-PINE BY BARK BEETLE VECTORED FUNGI
    POPP, MP
    JOHNSON, JD
    MASSEY, TL
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1991, 21 (07): : 1124 - 1126
  • [8] Comparison of morphological and chemical properties between juvenile wood and compression wood of loblolly pine
    Yeh, TF
    Goldfarb, B
    Chang, HM
    Peszlen, I
    Braun, JL
    Kadla, JF
    HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2005, 59 (06) : 669 - 674
  • [9] Ecophysiological comparison of 50-year-old longleaf pine, slash pine and loblolly pine
    Samuelson, Lisa J.
    Stokes, Tom A.
    Johnsen, Kurt H.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 274 : 108 - 115
  • [10] Species differences in early growth and rust incidence of loblolly and slash pine
    López-Upton, J
    White, TL
    Huber, DA
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 132 (2-3) : 211 - 222