Comparison of handling and acceptability of two spacer devices in young children with asthma

被引:0
|
作者
Brand, PLP
van der Baan-Slootweg, OH
Heynens, JWCM
de Vries, TW
Versteegh, FGA
Vreuls, RCFM
den Ouden, WJ
Smit, FJ
机构
[1] Isala Klin, Dept Paediat, NL-8000 GM Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] Asthma Ctr Heideheuvel, Hilversum, Netherlands
[3] Maasland Hosp, Sittard, Netherlands
[4] Groene Hart Hosp, Gouda, Netherlands
[5] Med Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
[6] Ikazia Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] St Clara Hosp, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
asthma; Babyhaler; NebuChamber; preference; spacer device;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
This study compared parents' preference for two spacer devices, NebuChamber(R) and Babyhaler(R) for the treatment of young children with asthma. In this open, cross-over study 141 patients (aged 5-57 mo) who used inhaled steroids via a spacer device were randomized to budesonide via NebuChamber or beclomethasone dipropionate via Babyhaler. Both treatments were given by the parents twice daily for wk. At the final visit parents completed a questionnaire on preference in general and for a given set of features. Acceptability and handling were scored in a diary. Diary scores on acceptability by the child and handling of both spacer devices were comparable. In the preference questionnaire, 68% of parents preferred NebuChamber [95% confidence interval (CI) 60-76] and 25% Babyhaler (95% CI 18-33). The preference was independent of the type of spacer used before the study and was also apparent in the different features: acceptability by child, carrying around. cleaning, close fitting of face mask, assembling and disassembling, damage resistance and size. These differences were statistically significant for all features, except for acceptability by the child. Conclusion: Two-thirds of parents prefer NebuChamber over Babyhaler for the treatment of their young asthmatic children.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 136
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Demands on spacer devices for young children
    Bisgaard, H
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 1997, : 188 - 189
  • [2] ALTERNATE SPACER DEVICES IN THE TREATMENT OF ASTHMA IN CHILDREN
    Zar, Heather J.
    CURRENT ALLERGY & CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 27 (04) : 265 - 267
  • [3] Are spacer devices so easy to use for children with asthma?
    Dubus, JC
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 2001, 30 (04): : 182 - 186
  • [4] Bacterial contamination of spacer devices used by children with asthma
    Cohen, HA
    Cohen, Z
    Kahan, E
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02): : 195 - 196
  • [5] Spacer devices in asthma
    Buchdahl, R
    Ward, S
    Summerfield, A
    THORAX, 2000, 55 (12) : 1070 - 1070
  • [6] SPACER DEVICES FOR ASTHMA
    NEWHOUSE, MT
    DOLOVICH, M
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1986, 109 (05): : 913 - 913
  • [7] Alternative spacer devices for bronchodilator therapy in children with acute asthma
    Zar, HJ
    Brown, G
    Donson, H
    Brathwaite, N
    Weinberg, EG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (03) : A140 - A140
  • [8] Electrostatic charge on spacer devices and salbutamol response in young children
    Dubus, JC
    Guillot, C
    Badier, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2003, 261 (1-2) : 159 - 164
  • [9] Acceptability and preference of three inhalation devices assessed by the Handling Questionnaire in asthma and COPD patients
    Dal Negro, Roberto W.
    Povero, Massimiliano
    MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 11
  • [10] The efficacy of alternative spacer devices for delivery of aerosol therapy to children with asthma
    Zar, HJ
    Liebenberg, M
    Weinberg, EG
    Binns, HJ
    Mann, MD
    ANNALS OF TROPICAL PAEDIATRICS, 1998, 18 (02): : 75 - 79