Combined Effect of Deceased Donor Macrovesicular and Microvesicular Steatosis on Liver Transplantation Outcomes: Analysis of SRTR Data Between 2010 and 2018

被引:2
|
作者
Ayloo, Subhashini [1 ]
Molinari, Michele [2 ]
Pentakota, Sri Ram [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers, Dept Surg, New Jersey Med Sch, Newark, NJ USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
GRAFT STEATOSIS; RISK; MICROSTEATOSIS; IMPACT; GRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.08.046
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Because of the rising prevalence of obesity, the use of steatotic grafts in orthotopic liver transplantation is becoming increasingly obligatory. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative distribution of microvesicular steatosis (MiS) burden across categories of macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) and the effect of biopsy-sourced MaS and MiS on graft failure, recipient death, and retransplantation. Methods. We performed a retrospective analysis of 13,889 adults with deceased donor liver transplantations from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 2010 and 2018. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were run to examine the independent and combined effects of MaS and MiS on major transplantation outcomes. Results. Recipients had a mean age of 56.5 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 kg/m(2); 70% were men, and 74% were non-Hispanic white. Considering the independent effect of MaS, recipients of livers with 30% to 60% MaS had 97% and 129%, 71% and 81%, 39% and 43%, and 40% and 19% increased risks of graft failure and death at 1 month, 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years post-transplantation, respectively. Considering the combined effects of MaS and MiS, 16% to 60% MaS increased the risk of graft failure and recipient death regardless of MiS burden within the first 3 months post-transplantation. These risks were also increased among recipients of livers with 5% to 15% MaS and the additional burden of 16% to 60% MiS. Conclusions. Our findings suggest that risk threshold of adverse transplantation outcomes owing to steatosis appears to be lower than previously recognized and currently practiced. These risks must be weighed and mitigated against the duress of organ shortage and saving lives.
引用
收藏
页码:2971 / 2982
页数:12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Incorporation of Donor Liver Macrovesicular Steatosis Into Srtr Risk Adjustment Models for Deceased Donor Yield and Post-Transplant Outcome
    Kwong, A.
    Wang, C.
    Wey, A.
    Salkowski, N.
    Snyder, J.
    Wetmore, J.
    Israni, A.
    Lake, J.
    Stock, P.
    Kim, W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 344 - 344
  • [2] Grade of deceased donor liver macrovesicular steatosis impacts graft and recipient outcomes more than the Donor Risk Index
    de Graaf, Esther L.
    Kench, James
    Dilworth, Pamela
    Shackel, Nicholas A.
    Strasser, Simone I.
    Joseph, David
    Pleass, Henry
    Crawford, Michael
    McCaughan, Geoff W.
    Verran, Deborah J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 (03) : 540 - 546
  • [3] Outcomes of Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation in Children: Analysis of the SRTR Registry
    Calinescu-Tuleasca, A.
    Wildhaber, B.
    Poncet, A.
    Toso, C.
    McLin, V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 : 48 - 48
  • [4] Outcomes of Combined Liver/Lung Transplantation for Cystic Fibrosis Using SRTR Analysis
    Halldorson, J.
    AlQahtani, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 17 : 599 - 599
  • [5] Computed Tomography-Based Radiomic Analysis for Preoperatively Predicting the Macrovesicular Steatosis Grade in Cadaveric Donor Liver Transplantation
    Ding, Shengnan
    Yang, Weimin
    Sun, Xiaodong
    Guo, Yan
    Zhao, Guangjie
    Yang, Jinzhu
    Zhang, Lei
    Lv, Guoyue
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [6] Donor-Recipient Matching in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Outcomes Using UNOS Match Sequence Data
    Seal, John
    Battula, Narendra
    Bohorquez, Humberto
    Ahmed, Emily
    Bruce, David
    Carmody, Ian
    Reichman, Trevor
    Bzowej, Natalie
    Joshi, Shoba
    Girgrah, Nigel
    Therapondas, George
    Cohen, Ari
    Loss, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 77 - 77
  • [7] Effect of Donor-Recipient Age Gradient on Graft Outcomes in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation
    Shin, M.
    Kim, J. M.
    Park, J. B.
    Kwon, Ch. H. D.
    Kim, S. -J.
    Joh, J. -W.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (08) : 3013 - 3018
  • [8] Operative outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation and deceased donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wan, Ping
    Yu, Xin
    Xia, Qiang
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 20 (04) : 425 - 436
  • [9] Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation
    Barbetta, Arianna
    Aljehani, Mayada
    Kim, Michelle
    Tien, Christine
    Ahearn, Aaron
    Schilperoort, Hannah
    Sher, Linda
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (07) : 2399 - 2412
  • [10] Living Donor versus Deceased Donor Pediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
    Barbetta, A.
    Butler, C.
    Barhouma, S.
    Hogen, R.
    Roque, B.
    Schillperoort, H.
    Meeberg, G.
    Shapiro, J.
    Kwon, Y.
    Kohli, R.
    Emamaullee, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 : 789 - 789